PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZLV vs. BGIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZLV vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PZLV

1D
1.34%
1M
5.28%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BGIG

1D
0.45%
1M
2.02%
YTD
10.33%
6M
10.33%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZLV vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PZLV and BGIG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZLV vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZLV

BGIG
BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZLV vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PZLV vs. BGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PZLVBGIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.63

1.40

+5.24

Drawdowns

PZLV vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZLV drawdown since its inception was -2.30%, smaller than the maximum BGIG drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZLV and BGIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZLVBGIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-13.24%

+10.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-1.70%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

Volatility

PZLV vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZLVBGIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.20%

8.99%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

11.94%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.20%

11.94%

+2.26%

PZLV vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZLV vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

PZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BGIG
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
1.74%1.89%2.02%0.78%
PZLV
Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZLV and BGIG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BGIG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BGIG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PZLV.

BGIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for PZLV.

They also come from different issuers: Pzena and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PZLV and 0.45% for BGIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZLV and BGIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer