PZLV vs. DIVZ
PZLV (Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PZLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.
Performance
PZLV vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PZLV
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVZ
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 12.27%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- —
PZLV vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 18.94% |
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZLV and DIVZ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZLV vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank
PZLV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIVZ
PZLV vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZLV | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZLV vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZLV drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum DIVZ drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZLV and DIVZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZLV | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -15.42% | +12.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.38% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -3.47% | +2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.51% | — |
Volatility
PZLV vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZLV | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 9.82% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 12.67% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 12.57% | +1.78% |
PZLV vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZLV vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison
PZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.51% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% |
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZLV and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PZLV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PZLV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.
DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.00% for PZLV.
They also come from different issuers: Pzena and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PZLV and 0.65% for DIVZ.
Find the right allocation for PZLV and DIVZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer