PZIEX vs. IFN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PZIEX (Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class) and IFN (The India Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PZIEX returned 12.71%/yr vs 5.99%/yr for IFN. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PZIEX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for IFN.

Performance

PZIEX vs. IFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and The India Fund (IFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZIEX achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than IFN's -15.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PZIEX has outperformed IFN with an annualized return of 12.71%, while IFN has yielded a comparatively lower 5.99% annualized return.

PZIEX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 17.08%
• 6M: 18.53%
• 1Y: 44.08%
• 3Y*: 22.80%
• 5Y*: 11.54%
• 10Y*: 12.71%

IFN

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -5.23%
• YTD: -15.46%
• 6M: -17.27%
• 1Y: -22.15%
• 3Y*: 0.84%
• 5Y*: 0.25%
• 10Y*: 5.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZIEX vs. IFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PZIEX Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class	17.08%	35.49%	4.54%	20.73%	-5.67%	6.65%	8.43%	13.57%	-10.23%	29.98%
IFN The India Fund	-15.46%	0.42%	-2.26%	36.48%	-15.85%	22.31%	12.25%	11.27%	-5.33%	37.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PZIEX and IFN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between PZIEX and IFN has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PZIEX vs. IFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZIEX

PZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 79
PZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

IFN

IFN Risk / Return Rank: 0
IFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
IFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
IFN Omega Ratio Rank: 0
IFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
IFN Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZIEX vs. IFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and The India Fund (IFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PZIEX	IFN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.03	-1.35	+4.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	-2.00	+5.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	0.79	+0.76
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	-0.85	+4.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.84	-1.88	+13.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PZIEX vs. IFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZIEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the IFN Sharpe Ratio of -1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZIEX and IFN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PZIEX	IFN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.03	-1.35	+4.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.01	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.32	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.23	+0.40

Drawdowns

PZIEX vs. IFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZIEX drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum IFN drawdown of -71.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZIEX and IFN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PZIEX	IFN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.59%	-71.52%	+26.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.79%	-26.05%	+13.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.40%	-31.53%	+15.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.38%	-31.53%	+6.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.59%	-41.48%	-3.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.29%	-29.31%	+27.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.58%	-25.89%	+16.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	11.78%	-7.98%

Volatility

PZIEX vs. IFN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) is 4.49%, while The India Fund (IFN) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that PZIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PZIEX	IFN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	5.53%	-1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.72%	13.39%	-0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.89%	16.41%	-1.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.74%	17.67%	-2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.37%	18.90%	-3.53%

PZIEX vs. IFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZIEX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IFN's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

PZIEX vs. IFN - Dividend Comparison

PZIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than IFN's 20.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IFN The India Fund	20.07%	16.09%	14.60%	8.97%	21.47%	15.21%	9.77%	11.57%	22.25%	12.11%	7.97%	8.02%
PZIEX Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class	4.10%	4.81%	7.38%	5.79%	2.08%	2.79%	1.28%	6.32%	1.28%	1.41%	0.98%	2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PZIEX and IFN in my portfolio?

PZIEX and IFN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PZIEX or IFN?

IFN has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to PZIEX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZIEX dropped -44.59% vs IFN's -71.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PZIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.