PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZIEX vs. FIQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZIEX vs. FIQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZIEX achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly lower than FIQGX's 19.34% return.


PZIEX

1D
1.20%
1M
3.31%
YTD
15.84%
6M
17.57%
1Y
43.33%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.59%

FIQGX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.42%
YTD
19.34%
6M
21.35%
1Y
40.36%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZIEX vs. FIQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PZIEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class
15.84%35.49%4.54%20.73%-5.67%6.65%8.43%13.57%-1.90%
FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z
19.34%31.96%-3.54%20.94%-11.74%6.86%17.11%19.81%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PZIEX and FIQGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.70

The correlation between PZIEX and FIQGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZIEX vs. FIQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZIEX
PZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQGX
FIQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FIQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZIEX vs. FIQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PZIEXFIQGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.88

3.14

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.81

4.03

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.58

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

4.17

-0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.93

16.07

-5.14

PZIEX vs. FIQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZIEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the FIQGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZIEX and FIQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PZIEXFIQGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

3.14

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.62

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.73

-0.11

Drawdowns

PZIEX vs. FIQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZIEX drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than FIQGX's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZIEX and FIQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZIEXFIQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-38.41%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-9.55%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

-17.26%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.38%

-27.36%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-1.76%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-6.91%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

2.48%

+1.32%

Volatility

PZIEX vs. FIQGX - Volatility Comparison

Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZIEXFIQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.32%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

10.66%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

13.22%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

14.11%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.37%

16.76%

-1.39%

PZIEX vs. FIQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZIEX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZIEX vs. FIQGX - Dividend Comparison

PZIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than FIQGX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z
4.08%4.87%4.07%2.20%1.86%12.04%0.71%1.22%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PZIEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class
4.15%4.81%7.38%5.79%2.08%2.79%1.28%6.32%1.28%1.41%0.98%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZIEX and FIQGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZIEX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FIQGX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZIEX dropped -44.59% vs FIQGX's -38.41%.

FIQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZIEX and FIQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer