PZG vs. PRGS
PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) and PRGS (Progress Software Corporation) are both stocks. PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while PRGS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, PZG returned -2.68%/yr vs 3.19%/yr for PRGS. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PZG vs. PRGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZG achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly higher than PRGS's -26.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PZG has underperformed PRGS with an annualized return of -2.68%, while PRGS has yielded a comparatively higher 3.19% annualized return.
PZG
- 1D
- 6.09%
- 1M
- -13.48%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 95.51%
- 3Y*
- 61.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- -2.68%
PRGS
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 17.43%
- YTD
- -26.75%
- 6M
- -29.75%
- 1Y
- -49.74%
- 3Y*
- -19.45%
- 5Y*
- -7.35%
- 10Y*
- 3.19%
PZG vs. PRGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | -3.17% | 268.42% | -8.80% | 8.70% | -50.62% | -40.29% | 51.28% | -6.82% | -36.15% | -26.97% |
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | -26.75% | -34.06% | 21.16% | 8.94% | 6.05% | 8.44% | 10.64% | 18.95% | -15.41% | 35.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZG and PRGS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006 | 0.10 |
The correlation between PZG and PRGS shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PZG:
$101.42M
PRGS:
$1.34B
PZG:
-$0.09
PRGS:
$1.95
PZG:
2.87
PRGS:
2.70
PZG:
$0.00
PRGS:
$987.62M
PZG:
-$892.14K
PRGS:
$802.40M
PZG:
-$11.01M
PRGS:
$136.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZG vs. PRGS — Risk / Return Rank
PZG
PRGS
PZG vs. PRGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZG | PRGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.81 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | -0.82 | +2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | -1.30 | +5.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZG vs. PRGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZG drawdown since its inception was -93.81%, which is greater than PRGS's maximum drawdown of -67.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZG and PRGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZG | PRGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.81% | -67.33% | -26.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.18% | -61.14% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.18% | -64.10% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.05% | -64.10% | -9.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.14% | -64.10% | -26.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.40% | -54.97% | -17.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.56% | -23.57% | -44.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.55% | 38.81% | -15.26% |
Volatility
PZG vs. PRGS - Volatility Comparison
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) has a higher volatility of 20.02% compared to Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) at 14.81%. This indicates that PZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZG | PRGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.02% | 14.81% | +5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.59% | 41.69% | +16.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.84% | 48.89% | +23.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.02% | 33.42% | +29.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.76% | 33.17% | +27.59% |
Dividends
PZG vs. PRGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither PZG nor PRGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 1.29% | 1.39% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.21% | 0.39% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PZG vs. PRGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. and Progress Software Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PZG and PRGS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZG has higher volatility (20.02%) compared to PRGS (14.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZG dropped -93.81% vs PRGS's -67.33%.
PZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZG and PRGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer