PortfoliosLab logo
PZFVX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PZFVX and VOO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

PZFVX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Classic Value Fund (PZFVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PZFVX:

0.30

VOO:

0.74

Sortino Ratio

PZFVX:

0.52

VOO:

1.04

Omega Ratio

PZFVX:

1.07

VOO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

PZFVX:

0.30

VOO:

0.68

Martin Ratio

PZFVX:

1.02

VOO:

2.58

Ulcer Index

PZFVX:

5.21%

VOO:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

PZFVX:

20.35%

VOO:

19.54%

Max Drawdown

PZFVX:

-72.29%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

PZFVX:

-6.22%

VOO:

-3.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZFVX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PZFVX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.96%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.


PZFVX

YTD

1.27%

1M

3.79%

6M

-4.24%

1Y

3.86%

3Y*

4.80%

5Y*

15.95%

10Y*

6.96%

VOO

YTD

0.90%

1M

5.53%

6M

-1.46%

1Y

13.29%

3Y*

14.31%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

12.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


John Hancock Classic Value Fund

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

PZFVX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZFVX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PZFVX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZFVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PZFVX is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PZFVX is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PZFVX is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PZFVX is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PZFVX is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PZFVX is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PZFVX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Classic Value Fund (PZFVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PZFVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZFVX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PZFVX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PZFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.92%, more than VOO's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PZFVX
John Hancock Classic Value Fund
51.92%52.58%6.33%19.26%0.58%1.29%4.56%2.43%0.95%1.78%1.41%0.83%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.29%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

PZFVX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZFVX drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZFVX and VOO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PZFVX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Classic Value Fund (PZFVX) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.84%. This indicates that PZFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...