PZFVX vs. TAGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Classic Value Fund (PZFVX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX).
PZFVX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jun 24, 1996. TAGRX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 1, 1984.
Performance
PZFVX vs. TAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PZFVX vs. TAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZFVX John Hancock Classic Value Fund | -5.68% | 12.09% | 4.48% | 18.69% | -7.11% | 28.27% | -2.70% | 24.79% | -16.94% | 16.47% |
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | -8.29% | 9.98% | 21.14% | 32.23% | -24.86% | 29.16% | 20.55% | 35.06% | -14.09% | 19.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZFVX achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly higher than TAGRX's -8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PZFVX has underperformed TAGRX with an annualized return of 8.51%, while TAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.
PZFVX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -5.68%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
TAGRX
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- YTD
- -8.29%
- 6M
- -6.58%
- 1Y
- 7.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PZFVX vs. TAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZFVX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGRX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PZFVX vs. TAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
PZFVX
TAGRX
PZFVX vs. TAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Classic Value Fund (PZFVX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZFVX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | 0.40 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 0.70 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.10 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 0.56 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.97 | 1.91 | -0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZFVX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 0.40 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.36 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.57 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.46 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PZFVX and TAGRX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PZFVX vs. TAGRX - Dividend Comparison
PZFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.36%, more than TAGRX's 13.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZFVX John Hancock Classic Value Fund | 38.36% | 36.18% | 52.58% | 6.33% | 19.26% | 0.58% | 1.29% | 4.56% | 2.43% | 0.95% | 1.78% | 1.41% |
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | 13.18% | 12.09% | 13.00% | 6.67% | 6.76% | 7.82% | 0.30% | 0.53% | 14.05% | 8.22% | 2.96% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
PZFVX vs. TAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZFVX drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than TAGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZFVX and TAGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZFVX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -58.45% | -13.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -14.04% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.35% | -29.10% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.82% | -36.96% | -14.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.14% | -11.64% | -17.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.54% | -11.57% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 4.13% | +0.38% |
Volatility
PZFVX vs. TAGRX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Classic Value Fund (PZFVX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) at 5.19%. This indicates that PZFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PZFVX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 5.19% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 10.11% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.83% | 18.91% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.90% | 20.21% | +13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 20.50% | +10.10% |