PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZFVX vs. BUFBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZFVX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Classic Value Fund (PZFVX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZFVX achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than BUFBX's 12.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PZFVX has underperformed BUFBX with an annualized return of 9.45%, while BUFBX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.00% annualized return.


PZFVX

1D
0.15%
1M
5.05%
YTD
5.16%
6M
8.51%
1Y
15.04%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
9.45%

BUFBX

1D
0.57%
1M
3.64%
YTD
12.83%
6M
12.77%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZFVX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZFVX
John Hancock Classic Value Fund
5.16%12.09%4.48%18.69%-7.11%28.27%-2.70%24.79%-16.94%16.47%
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
12.83%10.37%10.26%7.42%3.97%29.97%-2.27%18.76%-7.01%13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PZFVX and BUFBX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between PZFVX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZFVX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZFVX
PZFVX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PZFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PZFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFBX
BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZFVX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Classic Value Fund (PZFVX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PZFVXBUFBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.40

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

7.18

-5.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

17.54

-13.36

PZFVX vs. BUFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the BUFBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZFVX and BUFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PZFVXBUFBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.28

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.84

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.64

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.59

-0.30

Drawdowns

PZFVX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZFVX drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than BUFBX's maximum drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZFVX and BUFBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZFVXBUFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.29%

-39.78%

-32.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-2.83%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.35%

-12.85%

-27.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.35%

-14.67%

-25.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.82%

-35.51%

-16.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.99%

-0.22%

-20.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-4.72%

-9.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

1.16%

+2.88%

Volatility

PZFVX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Classic Value Fund (PZFVX) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) at 3.06%. This indicates that PZFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZFVXBUFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.06%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

6.61%

+4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

8.93%

+6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.83%

13.40%

+20.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.58%

15.60%

+14.98%

PZFVX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZFVX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZFVX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison

PZFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.41%, more than BUFBX's 7.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
7.99%9.10%3.77%3.48%4.16%5.57%3.33%2.73%6.01%5.49%2.39%3.67%
PZFVX
John Hancock Classic Value Fund
34.41%36.18%52.58%6.33%19.26%0.58%1.29%4.56%2.43%0.95%1.78%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZFVX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZFVX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to BUFBX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZFVX dropped -72.29% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.

BUFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZFVX and BUFBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer