PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFBX vs. PRWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFBX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFBX achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's 4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFBX has underperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.


BUFBX

1D
0.14%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
8.19%
6M
8.08%
1Y
14.07%
3Y*
12.42%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
9.64%

PRWCX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
4.53%
6M
4.44%
1Y
12.48%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFBX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
8.19%10.37%10.26%7.42%3.97%29.97%-2.27%18.76%-7.01%13.20%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
4.53%12.45%12.50%18.85%-12.00%18.45%18.13%24.62%0.63%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFBX and PRWCX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 1994

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between BUFBX and PRWCX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFBX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFBX
BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWCX
PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFBX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFBXPRWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

2.07

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.49

8.70

+2.79

BUFBX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFBX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFBX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFBX drawdown since its inception was -39.78%, roughly equal to the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFBX and PRWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFBXPRWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.78%

-41.77%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.45%

-6.32%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-15.96%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.67%

-17.07%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-26.86%

-8.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-1.58%

-2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-3.33%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

1.50%

-0.24%

Volatility

BUFBX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 2.80%. This indicates that BUFBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFBXPRWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

2.80%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

6.47%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.19%

7.81%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

12.79%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.61%

12.76%

+2.85%

BUFBX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFBX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFBX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

BUFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.42%, which matches PRWCX's 8.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
8.42%9.10%3.77%3.48%4.16%5.57%3.33%2.73%6.01%5.49%2.39%3.67%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
8.43%8.81%10.38%4.15%9.44%9.23%7.97%5.83%7.46%6.82%3.51%9.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFBX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFBX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to PRWCX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFBX dropped -39.78% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

PRWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFBX and PRWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer