PZA vs. JEPI
PZA (Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) and JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PZA is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the BofA ML National Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index, while JEPI is a Dividend fund actively managed by JPMorgan. PZA is passively managed, while JEPI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PZA returned 0.03%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for JEPI. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PZA charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPI.
Performance
PZA vs. JEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZA achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than JEPI's 0.69% return.
PZA
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- 8.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
JEPI
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 8.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- —
PZA vs. JEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZA Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 2.60% | 1.81% | 0.81% | 8.64% | -13.17% | 2.37% | 4.69% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 0.69% | 8.09% | 12.57% | 9.83% | -3.49% | 21.52% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZA and JEPI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2020 | 0.16 |
PZA vs. JEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PZA
JEPI
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PZA
JEPI
Consumer Cyclical
PZA
JEPI
Technology
PZA
JEPI
Industrials
PZA
JEPI
Basic Materials
PZA
-
JEPI
Communication Services
PZA
-
JEPI
Consumer Defensive
PZA
-
JEPI
Energy
PZA
-
JEPI
Healthcare
PZA
-
JEPI
Real Estate
PZA
-
JEPI
Utilities
PZA
-
JEPI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZA vs. JEPI — Risk / Return Rank
PZA
JEPI
PZA vs. JEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZA) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZA | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.19 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 1.24 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.03 | 3.96 | +6.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZA | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.05 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.67 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.02 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
PZA vs. JEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZA drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, which is greater than JEPI's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZA and JEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZA | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.49% | -13.71% | -10.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -6.68% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.89% | -13.26% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.55% | -13.71% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -4.31% | +3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -2.12% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 2.08% | -1.18% |
Volatility
PZA vs. JEPI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZA) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) have volatilities of 1.49% and 1.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZA | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 1.46% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 6.10% | -3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23% | 7.87% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.00% | 11.06% | -5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 10.80% | -3.72% |
PZA vs. JEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZA has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZA vs. JEPI - Dividend Comparison
PZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than JEPI's 8.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.23% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 8.40% | 11.68% | 6.59% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PZA Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.63% | 3.55% | 3.22% | 2.91% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.44% | 2.81% | 3.19% | 3.04% | 3.23% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZA and JEPI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZA has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to JEPI (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZA dropped -24.49% vs JEPI's -13.71%.
On 5-year performance, JEPI leads with 7.37% vs 0.03% for PZA. On fees, PZA is cheaper at 0.28% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JEPI has performed better with a 7.37% return vs 0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PZA is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPI.
JEPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.23%, compared with 3.63% for PZA.
PZA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while JEPI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PZA and 0.35% for JEPI.
PZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZA and JEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer