PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PZA vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PZA vs. BND

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PZA (Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PZA is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the BofA ML National Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PZA returned 1.88%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for BND. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PZA charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.

Performance

PZA vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZA achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PZA has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 1.88%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.

PZA

1D
0.26%
1M
0.88%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.78%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
3.33%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
1.88%

BND

1D
0.03%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZA vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZA
Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF		2.47%1.81%0.81%8.64%-13.17%2.37%5.07%9.00%-0.09%6.95%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF		0.46%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PZA and BND is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2007

0.53

The correlation between PZA and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

Often compared with PZA:
PZA vs. VTEBPZA vs. MUBPZA vs. HYMUPZA vs. NJTFXPZA vs. VNJTXPZA vs. VTEIPZA vs. IEF
Often compared with BND:
BND vs. BNDXBND vs. FXNAXBND vs. AGGBND vs. FBNDBND vs. BNDWBND vs. TLTBND vs. VBTLX

Return for Risk

PZA vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PZA
PZA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZA Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZA vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PZABNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

1.38

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

2.07

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.24

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

1.85

+0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.63

5.66

+3.98

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PZA vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZA Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZA and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PZABNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

1.38

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.03

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.29

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.59

-0.16

Drawdowns

PZA vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZA drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZA and BND.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PZABNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.49%

-18.58%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-2.68%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.89%

-5.92%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

-17.91%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.69%

-18.58%

-3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-2.18%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-3.06%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.88%

+0.02%

Volatility

PZA vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZA) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.26%. This indicates that PZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PZABNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

1.26%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

2.68%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

3.78%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

6.02%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.08%

5.53%

+1.55%

PZA vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZA has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

PZA vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

PZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than BND's 3.96% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF		3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
PZA
Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF		3.63%3.55%3.22%2.91%2.68%2.34%2.44%2.81%3.19%3.04%3.23%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

PZA and BND have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZA has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to BND (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZA dropped -24.49% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 10-year performance, PZA leads with 1.88% vs 1.60% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PZA has performed better with a 1.88% return vs 1.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZA.

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 3.63% for PZA.

PZA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BND is Total Bond Market. PZA tracks BofA ML National Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PZA and 0.03% for BND.

PZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZA and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer