PZA vs. MUB
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZA) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB).
PZA and MUB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PZA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the BofA ML National Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2007. MUB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2007. Both PZA and MUB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PZA or MUB.
Correlation
The correlation between PZA and MUB is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PZA vs. MUB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PZA:
0.11
MUB:
0.27
PZA:
0.18
MUB:
0.39
PZA:
1.02
MUB:
1.05
PZA:
0.07
MUB:
0.23
PZA:
0.45
MUB:
1.05
PZA:
1.30%
MUB:
0.99%
PZA:
5.38%
MUB:
3.84%
PZA:
-24.49%
MUB:
-13.68%
PZA:
-5.61%
MUB:
-2.01%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZA achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than MUB's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PZA has outperformed MUB with an annualized return of 2.23%, while MUB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.
PZA
0.37%
-1.26%
0.37%
0.75%
0.38%
2.23%
MUB
0.85%
-0.90%
1.08%
0.96%
0.93%
2.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PZA vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZA has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PZA vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZA) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PZA vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison
PZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than MUB's 3.02% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZA Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 2.96% | 2.92% | 2.69% | 2.34% | 2.43% | 2.80% | 3.18% | 3.04% | 3.23% | 3.60% | 3.96% | 4.26% |
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 3.02% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 3.02% |
Drawdowns
PZA vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZA drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZA and MUB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PZA vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZA) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) at 1.22%. This indicates that PZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.