PYZ vs. XMVM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PYZ (Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PYZ tracks the Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index while XMVM tracks the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PYZ returned 8.18%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for XMVM. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PYZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.

Performance

PYZ vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYZ achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than XMVM's 17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PYZ has underperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 8.18%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.

PYZ

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -3.79%
• 6M: -2.06%
• YTD: 7.61%
• 1Y: 25.31%
• 3Y*: 10.94%
• 5Y*: 6.97%
• 10Y*: 8.18%
• ALL TIME*: 9.40%

XMVM

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 5.11%
• 6M: 13.72%
• YTD: 17.44%
• 1Y: 38.27%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 12.42%
• 10Y*: 12.44%
• ALL TIME*: 9.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF	$185.18K	$258.85K	$695.61K
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	$2.16M	$2.04M	$1.98M

PYZ vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF	7.61%	28.01%	2.54%	9.56%	-15.45%	32.68%	15.39%	20.66%	-24.33%	20.01%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	17.44%	18.46%	11.73%	16.31%	-8.21%	35.15%	5.68%	30.38%	-9.62%	2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PYZ and XMVM is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between PYZ and XMVM has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PYZ vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PYZ	XMVM
Basic Materials	81.7%	0.8%
Industrials	18.3%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	4.2%	14.8%
Energy	1.1%	13.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.6%	1.2%
Financial Services	0.3%	37.9%
Communication Services	-	0.9%
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	4.9%
Technology	-	5.1%
Utilities	-	8.5%

Return for Risk

PYZ vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PYZ

PYZ Risk / Return Rank: 38
PYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
PYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
PYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

XMVM

XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 91
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PYZ vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PYZ	XMVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	2.42	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	3.49	-2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.43	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	3.91	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.99	12.52	-8.54

PYZ vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYZ and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PYZ vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYZ drawdown since its inception was -65.15%, roughly equal to the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYZ and XMVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYZ	XMVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.15%	-62.83%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.75%	-9.18%	-8.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.74%	-24.12%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.97%	-24.12%	-8.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.46%	-45.07%	-7.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.32%	-0.71%	-10.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.59%	-10.20%	-2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.17%	2.86%	+3.31%

Volatility

PYZ vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.29%. This indicates that PYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYZ	XMVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	3.29%	+2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.47%	9.25%	+11.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.68%	14.85%	+11.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.51%	21.24%	+4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.42%	22.74%	+3.68%

PYZ vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYZ vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

PYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than XMVM's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF	0.50%	0.72%	1.13%	1.19%	1.18%	0.33%	1.04%	1.38%	1.20%	0.53%	1.07%	1.25%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.79%	2.07%	1.43%	1.57%	1.76%	1.10%	1.37%	1.73%	2.87%	2.22%	2.27%	2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYZ and XMVM in my portfolio?

PYZ and XMVM have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYZ or XMVM?

PYZ has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to XMVM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYZ dropped -65.15% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

Which ETF is better, PYZ or XMVM?

On 10-year performance, XMVM leads with 12.44% vs 8.18% for PYZ. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PYZ or XMVM?

Over the 10-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PYZ or XMVM?

XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PYZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PYZ or XMVM?

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.50% for PYZ.

What is the main difference between PYZ and XMVM?

PYZ tracks Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PYZ and 0.39% for XMVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.