PYPY vs. YMAG
PYPY (Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PYPY returned -35.68% vs 18.18% for YMAG. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYPY charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.
Performance
PYPY vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPY achieves a -18.47% return, which is significantly lower than YMAG's 1.91% return.
PYPY
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 8.47%
- 6M
- -16.97%
- YTD
- -18.47%
- 1Y
- -35.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 18.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PYPY vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | -18.47% | -30.17% | 44.67% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 1.91% | 18.64% | 34.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPY and YMAG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.38 |
PYPY vs. YMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PYPY
YMAG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PYPY
YMAG
Basic Materials
PYPY
-
YMAG
-
Communication Services
PYPY
-
YMAG
-
Consumer Cyclical
PYPY
-
YMAG
-
Consumer Defensive
PYPY
-
YMAG
-
Energy
PYPY
-
YMAG
-
Healthcare
PYPY
-
YMAG
-
Industrials
PYPY
-
YMAG
-
Real Estate
PYPY
-
YMAG
-
Technology
PYPY
-
YMAG
-
Utilities
PYPY
-
YMAG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPY vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank
PYPY
YMAG
PYPY vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYPY | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.19 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 1.27 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 3.87 | -5.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYPY vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and YMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPY | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.64% | -25.96% | -27.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.14% | -14.38% | -32.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.99% | -4.48% | -41.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -4.62% | -12.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.76% | 4.71% | +25.05% |
Volatility
PYPY vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison
Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 6.35%. This indicates that PYPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPY | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 6.35% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.29% | 13.45% | +15.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.83% | 17.25% | +16.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 20.98% | +9.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 20.98% | +9.86% |
PYPY vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYPY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYPY vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison
PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.58%, more than YMAG's 51.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 65.58% | 64.68% | 48.65% | 5.70% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 51.00% | 52.27% | 35.22% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPY and YMAG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPY has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to YMAG (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPY dropped -53.64% vs YMAG's -25.96%.
On 1-year performance, YMAG leads with 18.18% vs -35.68% for PYPY. On fees, PYPY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 6.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YMAG has performed better with a 18.18% return vs -35.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PYPY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
PYPY has the higher dividend yield at 65.58%, compared with 51.00% for YMAG.
Their fees differ too: 1.01% for PYPY and 1.28% for YMAG.
YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPY and YMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer