PYPY vs. USO
PYPY (Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - PYPY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. PYPY is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. Over the past year, PYPY returned -39.46% vs 97.20% for USO. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. PYPY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
PYPY vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPY achieves a -22.78% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 97.72% return.
PYPY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- -22.78%
- 6M
- -25.01%
- 1Y
- -39.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- 97.72%
- 6M
- 91.54%
- 1Y
- 97.20%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 23.67%
- 10Y*
- 3.57%
PYPY vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | -22.78% | -30.17% | 43.88% | 6.09% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 97.72% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -17.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPY and USO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPY vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
PYPY
USO
PYPY vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYPY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.37 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 4.79 | -5.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 9.00 | -10.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYPY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.16 | 2.21 | -3.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | -0.18 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
PYPY vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.64% | -98.19% | +44.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.14% | -20.39% | -26.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.84% | -85.45% | +36.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -75.30% | +59.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.57% | 10.84% | +15.73% |
Volatility
PYPY vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) is 5.09%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.97%. This indicates that PYPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 14.97% | -9.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.64% | 38.35% | -9.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.15% | 44.32% | -10.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.08% | 36.09% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.08% | 39.00% | -7.92% |
PYPY vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYPY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYPY vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.45%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 70.45% | 64.68% | 48.65% | 5.70% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPY and USO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (14.97%) compared to PYPY (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPY dropped -53.64% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 1-year performance, USO leads with 97.20% vs -39.46% for PYPY. On fees, USO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, PYPY has been the lower-risk option at 5.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USO has performed better with a 97.20% return vs -39.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for PYPY.
PYPY has the higher dividend yield at 70.45%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
PYPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and USCF. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for PYPY and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPY and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer