PYPY vs. OOSP
PYPY (Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and OOSP (Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PYPY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while OOSP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Obra. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PYPY returned -39.50% vs 6.71% for OOSP. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. PYPY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for OOSP.
Performance
PYPY vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPY achieves a -24.96% return, which is significantly lower than OOSP's 2.66% return.
PYPY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- -24.96%
- 6M
- -26.42%
- 1Y
- -39.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOSP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PYPY vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.96% | -30.17% | 31.53% |
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF | 2.66% | 7.41% | 6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPY and OOSP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2024 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPY vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank
PYPY
OOSP
PYPY vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYPY | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.39 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 5.13 | -5.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 19.00 | -20.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYPY vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and OOSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPY | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.64% | -1.31% | -52.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.14% | -1.31% | -45.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.29% | 0.00% | -50.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.73% | -0.20% | -16.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.04% | 0.35% | +27.69% |
Volatility
PYPY vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison
Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) at 0.44%. This indicates that PYPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPY | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 0.44% | +6.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.78% | 2.18% | +26.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.94% | 3.66% | +30.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.97% | 3.32% | +27.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.97% | 3.32% | +27.65% |
PYPY vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYPY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYPY vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison
PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.46%, more than OOSP's 6.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF | 6.45% | 6.71% | 5.42% | 0.00% |
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 74.46% | 64.68% | 48.65% | 5.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPY and OOSP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPY has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to OOSP (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPY dropped -53.64% vs OOSP's -1.31%.
On 1-year performance, OOSP leads with 6.71% vs -39.50% for PYPY. On fees, OOSP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OOSP has performed better with a 6.71% return vs -39.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OOSP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for PYPY.
PYPY has the higher dividend yield at 74.46%, compared with 6.45% for OOSP.
PYPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Obra. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for PYPY and 0.90% for OOSP.
OOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPY and OOSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer