PYPL vs. PDBC
PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) is Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, PYPL returned 2.09%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PYPL vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPL achieves a -17.86% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 27.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PYPL has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 2.09%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.
PYPL
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- 14.74%
- 6M
- -16.30%
- YTD
- -17.86%
- 1Y
- -32.65%
- 3Y*
- -12.64%
- 5Y*
- -30.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
PDBC
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 22.82%
- YTD
- 27.55%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
PYPL vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -17.86% | -31.44% | 38.98% | -13.77% | -62.23% | -19.48% | 116.51% | 28.64% | 14.22% | 86.52% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 27.55% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPL and PDBC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2015 | 0.14 |
The correlation between PYPL and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPL vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
PYPL
PDBC
PYPL vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYPL | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.28 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 1.86 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 6.57 | -7.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYPL vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPL drawdown since its inception was -87.30%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPL and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPL | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.30% | -49.52% | -37.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.92% | -16.55% | -33.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.34% | -16.55% | -40.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.30% | -27.63% | -59.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.30% | -40.73% | -46.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.42% | -10.63% | -73.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.24% | -23.11% | -13.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.96% | 4.69% | +26.27% |
Volatility
PYPL vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 6.25%. This indicates that PYPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPL | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.64% | 6.25% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.02% | 16.77% | +16.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.17% | 18.90% | +20.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.26% | 19.24% | +23.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.83% | 17.76% | +21.07% |
Dividends
PYPL vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than PDBC's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.01% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPL and PDBC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPL has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to PDBC (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPL dropped -87.30% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPL and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer