PYPL vs. IXC
PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Over the past 10 years, PYPL returned 2.09%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for IXC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PYPL vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPL achieves a -17.86% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 27.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PYPL has underperformed IXC with an annualized return of 2.09%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.
PYPL
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- 14.74%
- 6M
- -16.30%
- YTD
- -17.86%
- 1Y
- -32.65%
- 3Y*
- -12.64%
- 5Y*
- -30.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
IXC
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- 6M
- 24.48%
- YTD
- 27.00%
- 1Y
- 32.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
PYPL vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -17.86% | -31.44% | 38.98% | -13.77% | -62.23% | -19.48% | 116.51% | 28.64% | 14.22% | 86.52% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 27.00% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPL and IXC is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2015 | 0.24 |
The correlation between PYPL and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPL vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
PYPL
IXC
PYPL vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYPL | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.29 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 2.15 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 6.86 | -7.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYPL vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPL drawdown since its inception was -87.30%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPL and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPL | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.30% | -67.88% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.92% | -15.36% | -34.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.34% | -19.06% | -38.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.30% | -24.93% | -62.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.30% | -64.16% | -23.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.42% | -8.60% | -75.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.24% | -17.45% | -18.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.96% | 4.81% | +26.15% |
Volatility
PYPL vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 7.16%. This indicates that PYPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPL | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.64% | 7.16% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.02% | 15.96% | +17.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.17% | 19.42% | +19.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.26% | 23.49% | +18.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.83% | 26.82% | +12.01% |
Dividends
PYPL vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than IXC's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.99% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPL and IXC have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPL has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to IXC (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPL dropped -87.30% vs IXC's -67.88%.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPL and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer