PYLMX vs. PYELX
Compare and contrast key facts about Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX).
PYLMX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Apr 29, 1994. PYELX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011.
Performance
PYLMX vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PYLMX vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYLMX Payden Limited Maturity Fund | 0.29% | 5.22% | 6.08% | 5.34% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 1.85% | 3.34% | 1.76% | 1.64% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | -3.00% | 19.79% | -3.48% | 13.16% | -11.28% | -7.83% | 1.79% | 13.92% | -8.16% | 15.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYLMX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than PYELX's -3.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PYLMX has outperformed PYELX with an annualized return of 2.71%, while PYELX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.
PYLMX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.71%
PYELX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 11.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PYLMX vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYLMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PYLMX vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank
PYLMX
PYELX
PYLMX vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYLMX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.73 | 0.11 | +2.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.76 | 1.22 | +5.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.23 | 1.77 | +0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.38 | 0.24 | +9.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.06 | 3.45 | +29.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYLMX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 0.11 | +2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.67 | 0.04 | +2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.11 | 0.07 | +2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.38 | 0.03 | +2.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between PYLMX and PYELX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PYLMX vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison
PYLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than PYELX's 7.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYLMX Payden Limited Maturity Fund | 4.21% | 4.96% | 5.36% | 3.79% | 1.83% | 0.50% | 1.39% | 2.54% | 2.28% | 1.42% | 0.91% | 0.73% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | 7.49% | 7.32% | 7.08% | 5.38% | 5.93% | 5.36% | 4.69% | 5.46% | 6.67% | 6.15% | 5.44% | 5.26% |
Drawdowns
PYLMX vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYLMX drawdown since its inception was -5.56%, smaller than the maximum PYELX drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLMX and PYELX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYLMX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -56.98% | +51.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.52% | -50.21% | +49.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.24% | -51.98% | +50.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.56% | -52.62% | +47.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -6.64% | +6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -16.96% | +16.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.15% | 3.54% | -3.39% |
Volatility
PYLMX vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) is 0.28%, while Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that PYLMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PYLMX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.28% | 3.36% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.09% | 4.66% | -3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69% | 111.80% | -110.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.32% | 50.59% | -49.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 36.37% | -35.08% |