PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYELX vs. PELBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYELX vs. PELBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PYELX having a 1.30% return and PELBX slightly lower at 1.28%. Over the past 10 years, PYELX has outperformed PELBX with an annualized return of 10.18%, while PELBX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.38% annualized return.


PYELX

1D
-0.60%
1M
1.61%
YTD
1.30%
6M
2.12%
1Y
10.43%
3Y*
34.54%
5Y*
17.58%
10Y*
10.18%

PELBX

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.71%
YTD
1.28%
6M
2.34%
1Y
12.20%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
4.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYELX vs. PELBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
1.30%139.58%-3.48%13.16%-11.28%-7.83%1.79%13.92%-8.16%15.38%
PELBX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund
1.28%22.96%-0.75%15.11%-7.36%-8.13%2.16%17.23%-7.49%15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PYELX and PELBX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.91

The correlation between PYELX and PELBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYELX vs. PELBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYELX
PYELX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PYELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYELX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PYELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYELX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PELBX
PELBX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PELBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PELBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PELBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PELBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PELBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYELX vs. PELBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYELXPELBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.68

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

5.60

-0.94

PYELX vs. PELBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the PELBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYELX and PELBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYELX vs. PELBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYELX drawdown since its inception was -35.29%, roughly equal to the maximum PELBX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYELX and PELBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYELXPELBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.29%

-36.17%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-7.33%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.49%

-8.49%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.24%

-21.73%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.58%

-24.89%

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-2.35%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.38%

-11.21%

-5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.19%

+0.05%

Volatility

PYELX vs. PELBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) is 2.19%, while PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that PYELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PELBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYELXPELBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

2.48%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.89%

6.39%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.74%

7.36%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.33%

8.07%

+37.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.70%

8.91%

+23.79%

PYELX vs. PELBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYELX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PELBX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYELX vs. PELBX - Dividend Comparison

PYELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, more than PELBX's 7.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PELBX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund
7.08%6.71%7.08%4.81%3.24%4.87%4.87%6.14%6.88%5.84%5.69%5.51%
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
7.18%6.28%7.08%5.38%5.93%5.36%4.69%5.46%6.67%6.15%5.44%5.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PYELX and PELBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PELBX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to PYELX (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYELX dropped -35.29% vs PELBX's -36.17%.

PELBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYELX and PELBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer