PYLMX vs. BUSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PYLMX (Payden Limited Maturity Fund) and BUSIX (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYLMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for BUSIX.

Performance

PYLMX vs. BUSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PYLMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 4.61%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: 2.77%

BUSIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYLMX vs. BUSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYLMX Payden Limited Maturity Fund	1.39%	5.22%	6.08%	5.34%	0.56%	0.19%	1.85%	3.34%	1.76%	1.64%
BUSIX Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund	0.83%	4.93%	5.87%	5.09%	0.32%	0.31%	2.16%	3.27%	1.66%	1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PYLMX and BUSIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.41

The correlation between PYLMX and BUSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PYLMX vs. BUSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLMX

PYLMX Risk / Return Rank: 97
PYLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PYLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PYLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PYLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PYLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYLMX vs. BUSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYLMX	BUSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.49	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	38.00	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYLMX	BUSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.39	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PYLMX	BUSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-5.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.12%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PYLMX	BUSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.36%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.31%	—	—

PYLMX vs. BUSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BUSIX's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PYLMX vs. BUSIX - Dividend Comparison

PYLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than BUSIX's 3.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUSIX Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund	3.19%	4.29%	4.65%	3.48%	1.87%	1.24%	1.72%	2.60%	2.05%	1.57%	1.74%	1.36%
PYLMX Payden Limited Maturity Fund	4.51%	4.96%	5.36%	3.79%	1.83%	0.50%	1.39%	2.54%	2.28%	1.42%	0.91%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYLMX and BUSIX in my portfolio?

PYLMX and BUSIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.