PYLD vs. UGA
PYLD (PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. PYLD is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, PYLD returned 7.40% vs 80.94% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. PYLD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
PYLD vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYLD achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return.
PYLD
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -12.35%
- YTD
- 75.49%
- 6M
- 64.35%
- 1Y
- 80.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 25.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
PYLD vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 0.95% | 9.57% | 7.69% | 5.60% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 75.49% | -2.00% | 3.77% | -0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYLD and UGA is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | -0.15 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PYLD and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.15 to -0.38, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYLD vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
PYLD
UGA
PYLD vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYLD | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.37 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 5.47 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.44 | 13.25 | -2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYLD | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.32 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.04 | 0.12 | +1.92 |
Drawdowns
PYLD vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYLD drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLD and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYLD | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -86.59% | +82.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -14.88% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -12.35% | +11.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -36.76% | +36.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 6.13% | -5.42% |
Volatility
PYLD vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) is 1.24%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that PYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYLD | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 11.66% | -10.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 30.41% | -27.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.08% | 35.14% | -32.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 34.38% | -30.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 37.27% | -33.28% |
PYLD vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYLD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYLD vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 6.30% | 6.21% | 6.40% | 2.72% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYLD and UGA have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to PYLD (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLD dropped -4.52% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 80.94% vs 7.40% for PYLD. On fees, PYLD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 80.94% return vs 7.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PYLD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
PYLD is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PYLD and 0.75% for UGA.
PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYLD and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer