PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYHRX vs. PYFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYHRX vs. PYFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYHRX achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly higher than PYFRX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PYHRX has outperformed PYFRX with an annualized return of 6.13%, while PYFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.02% annualized return.


PYHRX

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.94%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
6.13%

PYFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.01%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
5.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYHRX vs. PYFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYHRX
Payden High Income Fund
2.20%8.73%8.13%14.73%-9.76%6.62%7.38%16.75%-2.85%6.54%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
1.52%6.61%8.90%12.86%0.27%3.93%1.72%8.49%0.31%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PYHRX and PYFRX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYHRX vs. PYFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYHRX
PYHRX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PYHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PYHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PYFRX
PYFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PYFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PYFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYHRX vs. PYFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYHRXPYFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

2.93

-1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

6.69

-2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.69

28.09

-4.40

PYHRX vs. PYFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYHRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is lower than the PYFRX Sharpe Ratio of 5.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYHRX and PYFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYHRXPYFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61

5.26

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

3.23

-3.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

1.39

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

1.39

-1.13

Drawdowns

PYHRX vs. PYFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYHRX drawdown since its inception was -50.79%, which is greater than PYFRX's maximum drawdown of -20.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYHRX and PYFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYHRXPYFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.79%

-20.18%

-30.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-0.97%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.79%

-2.66%

-48.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.79%

-4.80%

-45.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

-20.18%

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-0.59%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.23%

+0.14%

Volatility

PYHRX vs. PYFRX - Volatility Comparison

Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) at 0.32%. This indicates that PYHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYHRXPYFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.32%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.97%

1.02%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

1.23%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.06%

1.95%

+49.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.28%

3.62%

+32.66%

PYHRX vs. PYFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYHRX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PYFRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYHRX vs. PYFRX - Dividend Comparison

PYHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, less than PYFRX's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
7.04%7.55%8.88%8.35%5.08%2.94%3.19%4.45%4.22%3.30%3.53%3.17%
PYHRX
Payden High Income Fund
6.43%6.81%7.20%6.67%6.05%4.79%4.99%5.23%5.88%5.27%5.24%5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYHRX and PYFRX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYHRX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to PYFRX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYHRX dropped -50.79% vs PYFRX's -20.18%.

PYFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.26 vs 3.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYHRX and PYFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer