PYHRX vs. FDGFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PYHRX (Payden High Income Fund) and FDGFX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - PYHRX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Paydenfunds, while FDGFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, PYHRX returned 6.14%/yr vs 14.20%/yr for FDGFX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYHRX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FDGFX.

Performance

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYHRX achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than FDGFX's 17.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PYHRX has underperformed FDGFX with an annualized return of 6.14%, while FDGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.20% annualized return.

PYHRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.28%
• 6M: 3.19%
• 1Y: 9.12%
• 3Y*: 9.60%
• 5Y*: 5.06%
• 10Y*: 6.14%

FDGFX

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 5.09%
• YTD: 17.60%
• 6M: 19.54%
• 1Y: 40.14%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 15.99%
• 10Y*: 14.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	2.28%	8.73%	8.13%	14.73%	-9.76%	6.62%	7.38%	16.75%	-2.85%	6.54%
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	17.60%	22.48%	27.58%	17.86%	-11.61%	27.96%	2.20%	28.75%	-7.23%	18.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PYHRX and FDGFX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998	0.33

Over the past year, PYHRX and FDGFX have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PYHRX vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYHRX

PYHRX Risk / Return Rank: 96
PYHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PYHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PYHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
PYHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PYHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FDGFX

FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYHRX	FDGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.76	3.04	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.91	4.04	+1.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.89	1.54	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.59	4.01	+0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.81	18.07	+6.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYHRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is comparable to the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYHRX and FDGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYHRX	FDGFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76	3.04	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.97	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	0.74	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.53	-0.27

Drawdowns

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYHRX drawdown since its inception was -50.79%, smaller than the maximum FDGFX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYHRX and FDGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYHRX	FDGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.79%	-60.77%	+9.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.02%	-10.16%	+8.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.79%	-21.37%	-29.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.79%	-21.37%	-29.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.79%	-41.29%	-9.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-7.53%	+5.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	2.26%	-1.89%

Volatility

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) is 0.76%, while Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that PYHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYHRX	FDGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.76%	4.02%	-3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.96%	10.59%	-8.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46%	13.50%	-11.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.06%	16.59%	+34.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.29%	19.22%	+17.07%

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYHRX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

PYHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, less than FDGFX's 8.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	8.12%	9.35%	9.81%	3.48%	11.46%	7.81%	1.89%	4.84%	22.93%	15.35%	1.58%	8.44%
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	6.43%	6.81%	7.20%	6.67%	6.05%	4.79%	4.99%	5.23%	5.88%	5.27%	5.24%	5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYHRX and FDGFX in my portfolio?

PYHRX and FDGFX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYHRX or FDGFX?

FDGFX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to PYHRX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYHRX dropped -50.79% vs FDGFX's -60.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 3.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.