PortfoliosLab logo
PYHRX vs. FDGFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PYHRX and FDGFX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
283.03%
754.05%
PYHRX
FDGFX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PYHRX:

2.07

FDGFX:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

PYHRX:

2.81

FDGFX:

0.68

Omega Ratio

PYHRX:

1.48

FDGFX:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

PYHRX:

1.73

FDGFX:

0.40

Martin Ratio

PYHRX:

7.83

FDGFX:

1.47

Ulcer Index

PYHRX:

0.93%

FDGFX:

5.85%

Daily Std Dev

PYHRX:

3.51%

FDGFX:

21.90%

Max Drawdown

PYHRX:

-27.80%

FDGFX:

-60.08%

Current Drawdown

PYHRX:

-1.53%

FDGFX:

-11.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYHRX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than FDGFX's -5.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PYHRX has underperformed FDGFX with an annualized return of 5.10%, while FDGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return.


PYHRX

YTD

0.48%

1M

-0.32%

6M

1.06%

1Y

7.31%

5Y*

7.57%

10Y*

5.10%

FDGFX

YTD

-5.62%

1M

-0.24%

6M

-4.88%

1Y

7.71%

5Y*

15.02%

10Y*

9.53%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYHRX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for PYHRX: current value is 0.60%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
PYHRX: 0.60%
Expense ratio chart for FDGFX: current value is 0.48%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FDGFX: 0.48%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PYHRX vs. FDGFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYHRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PYHRX is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PYHRX is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PYHRX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PYHRX is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PYHRX is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PYHRX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FDGFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDGFX is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDGFX is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDGFX is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDGFX is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDGFX is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDGFX is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for PYHRX, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
PYHRX: 2.07
FDGFX: 0.39
The chart of Sortino ratio for PYHRX, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
PYHRX: 2.81
FDGFX: 0.68
The chart of Omega ratio for PYHRX, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
PYHRX: 1.48
FDGFX: 1.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for PYHRX, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
PYHRX: 1.73
FDGFX: 0.40
The chart of Martin ratio for PYHRX, currently valued at 7.83, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
PYHRX: 7.83
FDGFX: 1.47

The current PYHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYHRX and FDGFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.07
0.39
PYHRX
FDGFX

Dividends

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

PYHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, less than FDGFX's 10.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PYHRX
Payden High Income Fund
7.35%7.19%6.68%6.07%4.79%5.00%5.23%5.88%5.27%5.28%5.52%6.08%
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
10.32%9.81%3.48%11.46%7.81%1.89%4.84%22.93%17.18%1.58%9.63%19.50%

Drawdowns

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYHRX drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, smaller than the maximum FDGFX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYHRX and FDGFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.53%
-11.93%
PYHRX
FDGFX

Volatility

PYHRX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) is 2.44%, while Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a volatility of 14.42%. This indicates that PYHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.44%
14.42%
PYHRX
FDGFX