PYFRX vs. SFHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX).
PYFRX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 10, 2013. SFHIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 14, 2014.
Performance
PYFRX vs. SFHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PYFRX vs. SFHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYFRX Payden Floating Rate Fund | -0.31% | 6.61% | 8.90% | 12.86% | 0.27% | 3.93% | 1.72% | 8.49% | 0.31% | 2.82% |
SFHIX Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund | -1.02% | 5.70% | 8.14% | 11.50% | -0.95% | 3.90% | 1.77% | 588.11% | 0.53% | 3.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYFRX achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly higher than SFHIX's -1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PYFRX has underperformed SFHIX with an annualized return of 5.01%, while SFHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.07% annualized return.
PYFRX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 5.01%
SFHIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 26.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PYFRX vs. SFHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SFHIX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PYFRX vs. SFHIX — Risk / Return Rank
PYFRX
SFHIX
PYFRX vs. SFHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYFRX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.70 | 1.79 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | 2.50 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.88 | 1.49 | +0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.71 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | 5.65 | +5.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYFRX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 1.79 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.17 | 2.59 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.39 | 0.56 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 0.52 | +0.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between PYFRX and SFHIX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PYFRX vs. SFHIX - Dividend Comparison
PYFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than SFHIX's 7.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYFRX Payden Floating Rate Fund | 7.23% | 7.55% | 8.88% | 8.35% | 5.08% | 2.94% | 3.19% | 4.45% | 4.22% | 3.30% | 3.53% | 3.17% |
SFHIX Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.01% | 7.61% | 8.07% | 8.06% | 4.99% | 3.20% | 3.93% | 142.83% | 5.03% | 4.00% | 4.22% | 4.58% |
Drawdowns
PYFRX vs. SFHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYFRX drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, roughly equal to the maximum SFHIX drawdown of -19.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYFRX and SFHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYFRX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.18% | -19.94% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.18% | -2.25% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.80% | -5.57% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.18% | -19.94% | -0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -1.46% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -0.84% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.68% | -0.17% |
Volatility
PYFRX vs. SFHIX - Volatility Comparison
Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) have volatilities of 0.67% and 0.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PYFRX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.70% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.96% | 1.34% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04% | 2.16% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.94% | 1.98% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.62% | 46.68% | -43.06% |