PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYCEX vs. PYFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYCEX vs. PYFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYCEX achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than PYFRX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PYCEX has underperformed PYFRX with an annualized return of 4.20%, while PYFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.02% annualized return.


PYCEX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.79%
1Y
7.98%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
4.20%

PYFRX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.11%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
5.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYCEX vs. PYFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYCEX
Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
1.98%7.96%7.90%7.37%-11.02%0.80%8.17%11.90%-3.33%9.13%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
1.52%6.61%8.90%12.86%0.27%3.93%1.72%8.49%0.31%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PYCEX and PYFRX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.35

The correlation between PYCEX and PYFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYCEX vs. PYFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYCEX
PYCEX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PYCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PYCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PYFRX
PYFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PYFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PYFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYCEX vs. PYFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYCEXPYFRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.94

5.34

-1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.46

9.61

-3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.06

2.96

-0.90

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

6.89

-3.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.95

29.00

-14.05

PYCEX vs. PYFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYCEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.94, which is comparable to the PYFRX Sharpe Ratio of 5.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYCEX and PYFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYCEXPYFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94

5.34

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

3.23

-2.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.18

1.39

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Drawdowns

PYCEX vs. PYFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYCEX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, roughly equal to the maximum PYFRX drawdown of -20.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYCEX and PYFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYCEXPYFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.12%

-20.18%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.37%

-0.97%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.15%

-2.66%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.12%

-4.80%

-15.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.12%

-20.18%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-0.59%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.23%

+0.31%

Volatility

PYCEX vs. PYFRX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) at 0.33%. This indicates that PYCEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYCEXPYFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.33%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

1.03%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04%

1.23%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.23%

1.95%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.58%

3.62%

-0.04%

PYCEX vs. PYFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYCEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PYFRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYCEX vs. PYFRX - Dividend Comparison

PYCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than PYFRX's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYCEX
Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
6.33%6.50%6.21%5.59%4.92%5.23%4.00%4.81%5.13%4.84%4.18%4.51%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
7.04%7.55%8.88%8.35%5.08%2.94%3.19%4.45%4.22%3.30%3.53%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYCEX and PYFRX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYCEX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to PYFRX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYCEX dropped -20.12% vs PYFRX's -20.18%.

PYFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.34 vs 3.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYCEX and PYFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer