PYCEX vs. FNMIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PYCEX (Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund) and FNMIX (Fidelity New Markets Income Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PYCEX returned 3.86%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for FNMIX. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PYCEX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FNMIX.

Performance

PYCEX vs. FNMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYCEX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than FNMIX's 2.66% return. Over the past 10 years, PYCEX has outperformed FNMIX with an annualized return of 3.86%, while FNMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.39% annualized return.

PYCEX

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 1Y: 5.45%
• 3Y*: 7.42%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: 3.86%
• ALL TIME*: 4.13%

FNMIX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.50%
• 6M: 1.15%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 1Y: 10.22%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: 3.39%
• ALL TIME*: 8.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PYCEX vs. FNMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	1.90%	7.96%	7.90%	7.37%	-11.02%	0.80%	8.17%	11.90%	-3.33%	9.13%
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	2.66%	14.86%	6.80%	14.00%	-16.09%	-2.42%	4.62%	10.93%	-7.77%	10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PYCEX and FNMIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.69

The correlation between PYCEX and FNMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PYCEX vs. FNMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PYCEX

PYCEX Risk / Return Rank: 89
PYCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PYCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PYCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PYCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PYCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FNMIX

FNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PYCEX vs. FNMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PYCEX	FNMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.42	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.39	3.97	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.49	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.81	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.29	11.63	-1.33

PYCEX vs. FNMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYCEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the FNMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYCEX and FNMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PYCEX vs. FNMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYCEX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, smaller than the maximum FNMIX drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYCEX and FNMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYCEX	FNMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.12%	-42.76%	+22.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.37%	-3.85%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.15%	-5.87%	+2.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.12%	-27.16%	+7.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.12%	-27.16%	+7.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-1.81%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.96%	-5.67%	+2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	0.93%	-0.38%

Volatility

PYCEX vs. FNMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) is 0.48%, while Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that PYCEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYCEX	FNMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	0.89%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.63%	3.60%	-1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05%	4.46%	-2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.24%	6.64%	-3.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.57%	6.88%	-3.31%

PYCEX vs. FNMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYCEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FNMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYCEX vs. FNMIX - Dividend Comparison

PYCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than FNMIX's 4.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	4.58%	5.07%	4.71%	5.15%	3.93%	3.48%	4.06%	4.87%	4.98%	5.77%	6.93%	4.95%
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	6.44%	6.50%	6.21%	5.59%	4.92%	5.23%	4.00%	4.81%	5.13%	4.84%	4.18%	4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYCEX and FNMIX in my portfolio?

PYCEX and FNMIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYCEX or FNMIX?

FNMIX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to PYCEX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYCEX dropped -20.12% vs FNMIX's -42.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYCEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.