PY vs. VMAX
PY (Principal Value ETF) and VMAX (Hartford US Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PY returned 13.35% vs 29.68% for VMAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VMAX.
Performance
PY vs. VMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than VMAX's 14.67% return.
PY
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 13.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
VMAX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PY vs. VMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 3.34% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 5.65% |
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF | 14.67% | 15.65% | 15.89% | 5.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PY and VMAX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PY and VMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
PY vs. VMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PY
VMAX
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
PY
VMAX
Financial Services
PY
VMAX
Healthcare
PY
VMAX
Consumer Defensive
PY
VMAX
Consumer Cyclical
PY
VMAX
Industrials
PY
VMAX
Energy
PY
VMAX
Communication Services
PY
VMAX
Utilities
PY
VMAX
Basic Materials
PY
VMAX
Real Estate
PY
VMAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PY vs. VMAX — Risk / Return Rank
PY
VMAX
PY vs. VMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PY | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 6.13 | -3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | 21.52 | -14.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PY vs. VMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than VMAX's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and VMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PY | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -19.05% | -26.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -4.93% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -1.05% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -2.53% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.40% | +0.45% |
Volatility
PY vs. VMAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 2.79%, while Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PY | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 3.21% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 8.84% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 12.30% | -1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 15.43% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 15.43% | +4.64% |
PY vs. VMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VMAX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PY vs. VMAX - Dividend Comparison
PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than VMAX's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 2.15% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% |
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.14% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PY and VMAX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VMAX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to PY (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs VMAX's -19.05%.
On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 29.68% vs 13.35% for PY. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 29.68% return vs 13.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VMAX.
PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.86% for VMAX.
They also come from different issuers: Principal and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.29% for VMAX.
VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PY and VMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer