PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PY vs. LCAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PY vs. LCAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Value ETF (PY) and Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PY vs. LCAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PY
Principal Value ETF
-1.28%8.08%
LCAP
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF
-1.05%18.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly lower than LCAP's -1.05% return.


PY

1D
0.07%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
-1.28%
6M
-0.47%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
10.39%

LCAP

1D
0.83%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
0.21%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PY vs. LCAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LCAP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PY vs. LCAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PY
PY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LCAP
LCAP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PY vs. LCAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYLCAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.42

1.04

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

1.59

-0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.22

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.69

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.37

6.96

-4.59

PY vs. LCAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PY Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the LCAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PY and LCAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYLCAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

1.04

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.95

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between PY and LCAP is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PY vs. LCAP - Dividend Comparison

PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than LCAP's 0.11% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PY
Principal Value ETF
2.25%2.14%2.22%2.68%3.02%2.83%2.95%2.25%2.34%1.68%1.85%
LCAP
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF
0.11%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PY vs. LCAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than LCAP's maximum drawdown of -11.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and LCAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PYLCAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-11.31%

-34.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.27%

-11.04%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-6.15%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-1.71%

-3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.67%

+0.42%

Volatility

PY vs. LCAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 3.50%, while Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PYLCAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

5.21%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

10.68%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

17.58%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

17.58%

-1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

17.58%

+2.51%