PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PY vs. LCAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PY vs. LCAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Value ETF (PY) and Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly lower than LCAP's 9.75% return.


PY

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
3.40%
6M
2.76%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
10.81%

LCAP

1D
-1.40%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
9.75%
6M
8.45%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PY vs. LCAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PY
Principal Value ETF
3.40%7.77%
LCAP
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF
9.75%17.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PY and LCAP is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.66

The correlation between PY and LCAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PY vs. LCAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PY
PY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

LCAP
LCAP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PY vs. LCAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYLCAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.56

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

10.19

-3.37

PY vs. LCAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PY Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the LCAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PY and LCAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PY vs. LCAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than LCAP's maximum drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and LCAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYLCAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-11.78%

-33.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.20%

-9.32%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-2.88%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-1.68%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.34%

-0.48%

Volatility

PY vs. LCAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 2.75%, while Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYLCAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

4.79%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

10.79%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

13.39%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

16.98%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

16.98%

+3.10%

PY vs. LCAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LCAP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PY vs. LCAP - Dividend Comparison

PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than LCAP's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LCAP
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF
0.10%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PY
Principal Value ETF
2.15%2.14%2.22%2.68%3.02%2.83%2.95%2.25%2.34%1.68%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


PY and LCAP have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCAP has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to PY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs LCAP's -11.78%.

On 1-year performance, LCAP leads with 23.78% vs 12.67% for PY. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LCAP has performed better with a 23.78% return vs 12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LCAP.

PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.10% for LCAP.

PY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while LCAP is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.29% for LCAP.

LCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PY and LCAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer