PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXWGX vs. BKTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXWGX vs. BKTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund (PXWGX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXWGX achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than BKTSX's 10.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PXWGX has underperformed BKTSX with an annualized return of 13.90%, while BKTSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


PXWGX

1D
-0.62%
1M
6.66%
YTD
12.62%
6M
13.11%
1Y
30.36%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
13.90%

BKTSX

1D
-0.75%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.89%
6M
10.63%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXWGX vs. BKTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXWGX
Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund
12.62%15.75%20.64%24.46%-18.33%30.27%13.35%27.16%-4.54%21.89%
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
10.89%17.15%23.83%26.02%-19.05%25.56%20.82%31.12%-5.37%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PXWGX and BKTSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.96

The correlation between PXWGX and BKTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXWGX vs. BKTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXWGX
PXWGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PXWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PXWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BKTSX
BKTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BKTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BKTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXWGX vs. BKTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund (PXWGX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXWGXBKTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.14

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

14.42

+0.20

PXWGX vs. BKTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXWGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the BKTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXWGX and BKTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXWGXBKTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.29

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.74

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.82

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.82

-0.42

Drawdowns

PXWGX vs. BKTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXWGX drawdown since its inception was -57.59%, which is greater than BKTSX's maximum drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXWGX and BKTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXWGXBKTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.59%

-34.97%

-22.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-8.87%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.98%

-19.29%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-24.98%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

-34.97%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.75%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-4.53%

-10.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.93%

+0.17%

Volatility

PXWGX vs. BKTSX - Volatility Comparison

Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund (PXWGX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) at 3.05%. This indicates that PXWGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXWGXBKTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

3.05%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

9.14%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

12.18%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.83%

17.36%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

18.41%

+0.16%

PXWGX vs. BKTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXWGX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BKTSX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXWGX vs. BKTSX - Dividend Comparison

PXWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than BKTSX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
1.05%1.14%1.27%1.46%1.64%1.58%1.51%2.15%2.49%2.17%1.54%0.00%
PXWGX
Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund
4.78%5.39%16.28%5.95%7.66%21.85%1.92%3.36%7.95%4.53%10.42%6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PXWGX and BKTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PXWGX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to BKTSX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXWGX dropped -57.59% vs BKTSX's -34.97%.

PXWGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXWGX and BKTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer