PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXWGX vs. PAXLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXWGX vs. PAXLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund (PXWGX) and PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXWGX achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than PAXLX's -0.68% return.


PXWGX

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
9.90%
6M
8.67%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
14.04%

PAXLX

1D
0.74%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-0.68%
6M
-1.75%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXWGX vs. PAXLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXWGX
Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund
9.90%15.75%20.64%24.46%-18.33%30.27%13.35%27.16%-4.54%21.89%
PAXLX
PAX LARGE CAP FUND
-0.68%12.17%13.96%19.96%-20.01%30.64%23.75%34.88%-5.38%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PXWGX and PAXLX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2016

0.96

The correlation between PXWGX and PAXLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXWGX vs. PAXLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXWGX
PXWGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PXWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PXWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXLX
PAXLX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PAXLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXWGX vs. PAXLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund (PXWGX) and PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXWGXPAXLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.12

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

0.62

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.56

2.17

+9.40

PXWGX vs. PAXLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXWGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the PAXLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXWGX and PAXLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXWGX vs. PAXLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXWGX drawdown since its inception was -57.59%, which is greater than PAXLX's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXWGX and PAXLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXWGXPAXLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.59%

-32.73%

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-13.12%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.98%

-28.48%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-28.48%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-5.16%

+2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.52%

-6.18%

-8.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

3.74%

-1.57%

Volatility

PXWGX vs. PAXLX - Volatility Comparison

Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund (PXWGX) and PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) have volatilities of 5.15% and 5.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXWGXPAXLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

5.03%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

9.94%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

12.50%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

19.60%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.58%

19.56%

-0.98%

PXWGX vs. PAXLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXWGX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than PAXLX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXWGX vs. PAXLX - Dividend Comparison

PXWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than PAXLX's 29.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAXLX
PAX LARGE CAP FUND
29.76%29.38%18.38%4.28%2.92%5.80%6.67%3.49%25.45%13.18%0.07%0.00%
PXWGX
Pax U.S. Sustainable Economy Fund
4.99%5.39%16.28%5.95%7.66%21.85%1.92%3.36%7.95%4.53%10.42%6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXWGX and PAXLX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXWGX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to PAXLX (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXWGX dropped -57.59% vs PAXLX's -32.73%.

PXWGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXWGX and PAXLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer