EQL.TO vs. XMAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EQL.TO (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQL.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EQL.TO returned 20.53% vs 26.23% for XMAG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQL.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.

Performance

EQL.TO vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EQL.TO is traded in CAD, while XMAG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMAG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL.TO achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than XMAG's 14.16% return.

EQL.TO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 5.96%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 9.50%
• 1Y: 20.53%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 16.55%
• 10Y*: —

XMAG

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 8.82%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 6M: 12.84%
• 1Y: 26.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQL.TO vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EQL.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD	10.79%	5.94%	1.74%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	14.16%	10.32%	2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL.TO and XMAG is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024	0.86

The correlation between EQL.TO and XMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQL.TO vs. XMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQL.TO	XMAG
Technology	18.3%	25.3%
Industrials	14.7%	12.6%
Financial Services	14.4%	17.3%
Healthcare	10.9%	13.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	7.3%
Real Estate	6.2%	2.9%
Utilities	6.1%	3.4%
Energy	4.6%	5.5%
Basic Materials	4.1%	2.5%
Communication Services	4.0%	3.9%

Return for Risk

EQL.TO vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL.TO

EQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
EQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
EQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
EQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

XMAG

XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL.TO vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQL.TO	XMAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.39	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	3.41	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.42	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	4.35	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.94	15.95	-5.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQL.TO vs. XMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the XMAG Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL.TO and XMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQL.TO	XMAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.39	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.15	-0.10

Drawdowns

EQL.TO vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL.TO and XMAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQL.TO	XMAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.47%	-16.14%	-14.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.73%	-6.05%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	0.00%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-2.56%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	1.65%	+0.23%

Volatility

EQL.TO vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) at 2.89%. This indicates that EQL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQL.TO	XMAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	2.89%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.98%	8.70%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.99%	11.01%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.54%	14.93%	-0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	14.93%	+2.42%

EQL.TO vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQL.TO vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison

EQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than XMAG's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EQL.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD	1.26%	1.38%	5.37%	8.14%	8.91%	7.19%	9.96%	8.29%	1.35%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQL.TO and XMAG in my portfolio?

EQL.TO and XMAG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EQL.TO or XMAG?

On fees, EQL.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQL.TO or XMAG?

EQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMAG.

What is the main difference between EQL.TO and XMAG?

EQL.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. EQL.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQL.TO and 0.35% for XMAG.