PXQ vs. TDV
PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index while TDV tracks the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PXQ returned 22.20%/yr vs 14.36%/yr for TDV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXQ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for TDV.
Performance
PXQ vs. TDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 64.46% return, which is significantly higher than TDV's 23.61% return.
PXQ
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 27.63%
- YTD
- 64.46%
- 6M
- 64.45%
- 1Y
- 102.54%
- 3Y*
- 43.66%
- 5Y*
- 22.20%
- 10Y*
- 21.50%
TDV
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 10.43%
- YTD
- 23.61%
- 6M
- 23.27%
- 1Y
- 38.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 14.36%
- 10Y*
- —
PXQ vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 64.46% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 39.14% | 3.86% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 23.61% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQ and TDV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.83 |
The correlation between PXQ and TDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
PXQ vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXQ
TDV
Technology
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PXQ
TDV
Communication Services
PXQ
TDV
-
Real Estate
PXQ
TDV
-
Industrials
PXQ
TDV
Financial Services
PXQ
TDV
Basic Materials
PXQ
-
TDV
-
Consumer Cyclical
PXQ
-
TDV
-
Consumer Defensive
PXQ
-
TDV
-
Energy
PXQ
-
TDV
-
Healthcare
PXQ
-
TDV
-
Utilities
PXQ
-
TDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXQ vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank
PXQ
TDV
PXQ vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXQ | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.85 | 2.25 | +2.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.85 | 3.01 | +2.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.38 | +0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.32 | 4.11 | +6.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.42 | 14.24 | +31.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXQ | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.85 | 2.25 | +2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.71 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.76 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
PXQ vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and TDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQ | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -32.78% | -24.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -9.55% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -22.51% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | -25.11% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -5.36% | -5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.76% | -0.49% |
Volatility
PXQ vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a higher volatility of 9.05% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 5.01%. This indicates that PXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXQ | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 5.01% | +4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.13% | 12.71% | +4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.27% | 17.28% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 20.46% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 23.21% | -0.24% |
PXQ vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXQ vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison
PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than TDV's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.57% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 0.93% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXQ and TDV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXQ has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to TDV (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs TDV's -32.78%.
On 5-year performance, PXQ leads with 22.20% vs 14.36% for TDV. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 22.20% return vs 14.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.
TDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.57% for PXQ.
PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PXQ and 0.66% for TDV.
PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXQ and TDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer