PXQ vs. QTUM
PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index while QTUM tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PXQ returned 21.73%/yr vs 29.15%/yr for QTUM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
PXQ vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 53.29% return.
PXQ
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 26.38%
- YTD
- 63.41%
- 6M
- 62.53%
- 1Y
- 99.38%
- 3Y*
- 43.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
PXQ vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 63.41% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 39.14% | 26.35% | -15.09% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.29% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQ and QTUM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between PXQ and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
PXQ vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXQ
QTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PXQ
QTUM
Communication Services
PXQ
QTUM
Real Estate
PXQ
QTUM
-
Industrials
PXQ
QTUM
Financial Services
PXQ
QTUM
-
Basic Materials
PXQ
-
QTUM
-
Consumer Cyclical
PXQ
-
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
PXQ
-
QTUM
-
Energy
PXQ
-
QTUM
-
Healthcare
PXQ
-
QTUM
Utilities
PXQ
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXQ vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
PXQ
QTUM
PXQ vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXQ | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.70 | 3.65 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.72 | 4.26 | +1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.55 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.00 | 6.28 | +3.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 44.01 | 23.69 | +20.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXQ | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70 | 3.65 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 1.10 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.08 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
PXQ vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQ | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -38.45% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -15.26% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -25.39% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | -38.45% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.59% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -8.25% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 4.04% | -1.77% |
Volatility
PXQ vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) is 9.19%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that PXQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXQ | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 9.76% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.12% | 20.35% | -3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.28% | 26.26% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 26.56% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 27.17% | -4.20% |
PXQ vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PXQ and QTUM have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
PXQ vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than QTUM's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.57% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXQ and QTUM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to PXQ (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 21.73% for PXQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, PXQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 21.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXQ and QTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.57% for PXQ.
PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance.
PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 3.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXQ and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer