PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXQ vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PXQ vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PXQ vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PXQ
Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF
5.86%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%14.12%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-4.75%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -4.75% return.


PXQ

1D
2.12%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
5.86%
6M
10.12%
1Y
41.49%
3Y*
23.88%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
16.41%

QQQM

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
-4.75%
6M
-2.87%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PXQ vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXQ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PXQ vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXQ
PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXQ vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXQQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

1.09

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

1.68

+0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

2.02

+1.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.18

7.35

+7.83

PXQ vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXQ and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXQQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.09

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.64

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between PXQ and QQQM is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PXQ vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PXQ
Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF
0.88%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PXQ vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and QQQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PXQQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-35.04%

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-12.55%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-35.04%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.97%

-7.86%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-8.47%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.44%

-0.66%

Volatility

PXQ vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 6.58%. This indicates that PXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PXQQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

6.58%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

12.79%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.35%

22.45%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.87%

22.24%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.72%

22.26%

+0.46%