PXJ vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXJ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PXJ returned 18.32%/yr vs -30.65%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. PXJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

PXJ vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 41.36% return, which is significantly higher than BITI's 28.75% return.

PXJ

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -6.30%
• 6M: 29.86%
• YTD: 41.36%
• 1Y: 62.95%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: 20.43%
• 10Y*: -1.35%

BITI

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 34.68%
• YTD: 28.75%
• 1Y: 68.34%
• 3Y*: -30.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXJ vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	41.36%	8.74%	0.21%	14.44%	32.91%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	28.75%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between PXJ and BITI is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.19

Return for Risk

PXJ vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 84
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 57
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXJ vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PXJ	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	1.56	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.13	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.26	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	2.72	+0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.34	6.78	+5.56

PXJ vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXJ and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PXJ vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, roughly equal to the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	PXJ	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.82%	-92.16%	-2.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	-25.28%	+6.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.03%	-84.63%	+44.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.70%	-85.94%	+18.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.72%	-68.34%	+12.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	10.11%	-4.94%

Volatility

PXJ vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) is 8.58%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that PXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PXJ	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	11.38%	-2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.21%	34.25%	-15.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.83%	44.14%	-17.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.36%	52.28%	-17.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.20%	52.28%	-13.08%

PXJ vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXJ vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.10%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.47%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PXJ and BITI in my portfolio?

PXJ and BITI have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PXJ or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to PXJ (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXJ dropped -94.82% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, PXJ or BITI?

On 3-year performance, PXJ leads with 18.32% vs -30.65% for BITI. On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, PXJ has been the lower-risk option at 8.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PXJ or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, PXJ has performed better with a 18.32% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PXJ or BITI?

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PXJ or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 2.47% for PXJ.

What is the main difference between PXJ and BITI?

PXJ is categorized as Energy Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.