PXI vs. XMVM
PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PXI tracks the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index while XMVM tracks the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXI returned 6.10%/yr vs 12.28%/yr for XMVM. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PXI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.
Performance
PXI vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 30.24% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 18.13% return. Over the past 10 years, PXI has underperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 6.10%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.28% annualized return.
PXI
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 18.66%
- YTD
- 30.24%
- 1Y
- 41.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 21.98%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.64%
XMVM
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 39.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.58M | $2.88M | $1.34M | |
| $2.19M | $2.07M | $1.98M |
PXI vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 30.24% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 45.85% | 75.05% | -35.91% | 1.67% | -27.56% | -8.42% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 18.13% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | -8.21% | 35.15% | 5.68% | 30.38% | -9.62% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXI and XMVM is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PXI and XMVM has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PXI vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXI
XMVM
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
PXI
XMVM
Basic Materials
PXI
XMVM
Industrials
PXI
XMVM
Financial Services
PXI
XMVM
Communication Services
PXI
-
XMVM
Consumer Cyclical
PXI
-
XMVM
Consumer Defensive
PXI
-
XMVM
Healthcare
PXI
-
XMVM
Real Estate
PXI
-
XMVM
Technology
PXI
-
XMVM
Utilities
PXI
-
XMVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXI vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank
PXI
XMVM
PXI vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXI | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.48 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 4.28 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.15 | 13.71 | -4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXI vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than XMVM's maximum drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and XMVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXI | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.08% | -62.83% | -22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.40% | -9.18% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.74% | -24.12% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.47% | -24.12% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.55% | -45.07% | -34.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.12% | -0.12% | -5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.25% | -10.19% | -19.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 2.86% | +1.64% |
Volatility
PXI vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.30%. This indicates that PXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXI | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 3.30% | +3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.97% | 9.25% | +8.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 14.72% | +7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.81% | 21.24% | +11.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 22.74% | +14.20% |
PXI vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXI vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison
PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than XMVM's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.78% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXI and XMVM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXI has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to XMVM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXI dropped -85.08% vs XMVM's -62.83%.
On 10-year performance, XMVM leads with 12.28% vs 6.10% for PXI. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 12.28% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.26% for PXI.
PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.39% for XMVM.
XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXI and XMVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer