PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXI vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXI vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 32.39% return, which is significantly higher than MTUM's 30.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PXI has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 5.94%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.


PXI

1D
0.75%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
32.39%
6M
24.73%
1Y
46.96%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
5.94%

MTUM

1D
-1.10%
1M
11.94%
YTD
30.30%
6M
29.99%
1Y
40.55%
3Y*
34.34%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXI vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
32.39%3.86%0.76%5.48%45.85%75.05%-35.91%1.67%-27.56%-8.42%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
30.30%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PXI and MTUM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between PXI and MTUM has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PXI vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXI
MTUM

Energy

95.6%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.7%

Industrials

0.9%
15.6%

Communication Services

-

7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.3%

Financial Services

-

10.4%

Healthcare

-

6.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

44.4%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Energy

PXI
95.6%
MTUM
3.5%

Basic Materials

PXI
4.4%
MTUM
1.7%

Industrials

PXI
0.9%
MTUM
15.6%

Communication Services

PXI

-

MTUM
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PXI

-

MTUM
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

PXI

-

MTUM
3.3%

Financial Services

PXI

-

MTUM
10.4%

Healthcare

PXI

-

MTUM
6.9%

Real Estate

PXI

-

MTUM
1.8%

Technology

PXI

-

MTUM
44.4%

Utilities

PXI

-

MTUM
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXI vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXI
PXI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXI vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXIMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

3.53

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

14.10

-0.75

PXI vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXI and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXIMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.14

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.73

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.82

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.84

-0.68

Drawdowns

PXI vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXIMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.08%

-34.08%

-51.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-11.54%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.74%

-20.99%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.47%

-32.28%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.55%

-34.08%

-45.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-1.10%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.43%

-6.21%

-23.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.89%

+0.64%

Volatility

PXI vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) have volatilities of 7.81% and 7.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXIMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

7.67%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

16.51%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

19.08%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.47%

20.60%

+12.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

21.03%

+16.15%

PXI vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXI vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
1.28%1.81%1.52%1.82%3.14%0.57%1.72%2.80%0.93%0.80%0.73%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXI and MTUM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXI has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to MTUM (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXI dropped -85.08% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.19% vs 5.94% for PXI. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTUM has been the lower-risk option at 7.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.19% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.

PXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.15% for MTUM.

PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXI and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer