PXI vs. MTUM
PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - PXI tracks the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index while MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXI returned 5.94%/yr vs 17.19%/yr for MTUM. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PXI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
PXI vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 32.39% return, which is significantly higher than MTUM's 30.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PXI has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 5.94%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.
PXI
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 32.39%
- 6M
- 24.73%
- 1Y
- 46.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- 5.94%
MTUM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 30.30%
- 6M
- 29.99%
- 1Y
- 40.55%
- 3Y*
- 34.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.19%
PXI vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 32.39% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 45.85% | 75.05% | -35.91% | 1.67% | -27.56% | -8.42% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 30.30% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXI and MTUM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PXI and MTUM has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PXI vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXI
MTUM
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
PXI
MTUM
Basic Materials
PXI
MTUM
Industrials
PXI
MTUM
Communication Services
PXI
-
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
PXI
-
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
PXI
-
MTUM
Financial Services
PXI
-
MTUM
Healthcare
PXI
-
MTUM
Real Estate
PXI
-
MTUM
Technology
PXI
-
MTUM
Utilities
PXI
-
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXI vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
PXI
MTUM
PXI vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXI | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 3.53 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 14.10 | -0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXI | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.14 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.73 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.82 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.84 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
PXI vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXI | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.08% | -34.08% | -51.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.83% | -11.54% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.74% | -20.99% | -9.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.47% | -32.28% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.55% | -34.08% | -45.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -1.10% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.43% | -6.21% | -23.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.89% | +0.64% |
Volatility
PXI vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) have volatilities of 7.81% and 7.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXI | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 7.67% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 16.51% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 19.08% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.47% | 20.60% | +12.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.18% | 21.03% | +16.15% |
PXI vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXI vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.28% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXI and MTUM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXI has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to MTUM (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXI dropped -85.08% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.19% vs 5.94% for PXI. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTUM has been the lower-risk option at 7.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.19% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
PXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.15% for MTUM.
PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXI and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer