PXH vs. TJUN
PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
PXH vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 5.26% return.
PXH
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
TJUN
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXH vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 16.54% | 16.37% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 5.26% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXH and TJUN is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXH vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
PXH
TJUN
PXH vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXH | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.61 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.79 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXH | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 2.49 | -2.34 |
Drawdowns
PXH vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXH | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -4.47% | -59.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.87% | -0.60% | -16.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | — | — |
Volatility
PXH vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXH | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 7.55% | +7.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 7.55% | +10.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 7.55% | +12.52% |
PXH vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXH vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.38% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXH and TJUN have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PXH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PXH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.95% for TJUN.
Find the right allocation for PXH and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer