PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXH vs. TJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXH vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 1.65% return.


PXH

1D
-2.63%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
10.82%
6M
11.08%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
10.53%

TJUN

1D
-3.88%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.01%
1Y
13.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXH vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PXH and TJUN is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

0.81

The correlation between PXH and TJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXH vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

TJUN
TJUN Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXH vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXHTJUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

3.04

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

13.10

-3.06

PXH vs. TJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the TJUN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and TJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXH vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and TJUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXHTJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-4.47%

-59.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-4.47%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.91%

-3.88%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.82%

-0.58%

-16.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

1.04%

+1.85%

Volatility

PXH vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) at 4.01%. This indicates that PXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXHTJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

4.01%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

6.42%

+7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

8.33%

+7.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

8.33%

+9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

8.33%

+11.63%

PXH vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXH vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
4.34%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%
TJUN
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXH and TJUN have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXH has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to TJUN (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs TJUN's -4.47%.

On 1-year performance, PXH leads with 28.95% vs 13.53% for TJUN. On fees, PXH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TJUN has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PXH has performed better with a 28.95% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.95% for TJUN.

PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXH and TJUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer