PXH vs. SPMO
PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXH returned 10.99%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PXH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
PXH vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 10.99%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.89% annualized return.
PXH
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 14.80%
- YTD
- 29.70%
- 6M
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 42.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.51%
- 10Y*
- 20.89%
PXH vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 16.54% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 29.70% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXH and SPMO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | 0.48 |
The correlation between PXH and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PXH vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXH
SPMO
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
PXH
SPMO
Technology
PXH
SPMO
Energy
PXH
SPMO
Basic Materials
PXH
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
PXH
SPMO
Communication Services
PXH
SPMO
Industrials
PXH
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
PXH
SPMO
Utilities
PXH
SPMO
Real Estate
PXH
SPMO
Healthcare
PXH
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXH vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
PXH
SPMO
PXH vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXH | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.61 | 2.64 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 3.55 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 3.76 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.79 | 14.67 | +0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXH | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.64 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 1.28 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 1.03 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.01 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
PXH vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXH | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -30.95% | -32.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -12.70% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | -20.13% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -22.74% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.42% | -30.95% | -9.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.87% | -4.60% | -12.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.26% | -0.51% |
Volatility
PXH vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is 5.12%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that PXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXH | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 7.38% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 14.44% | -2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 17.65% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 19.31% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 20.31% | -0.24% |
PXH vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXH vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.38% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXH and SPMO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to PXH (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.89% vs 10.99% for PXH. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.89% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.
PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.66% for SPMO.
PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXH and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer