PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXH vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXH vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 22.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 9.29%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.70% annualized return.


PXH

1D
0.21%
1M
5.02%
6M
7.06%
YTD
14.44%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
9.29%
ALL TIME*
3.68%

SPMO

1D
1.06%
1M
-3.63%
6M
21.38%
YTD
22.35%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
38.16%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
19.70%
ALL TIME*
19.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.43M$7.06M$7.27M
$336.15M$337.86M$350.15M

PXH vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
14.44%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
22.35%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PXH and SPMO is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.49

The correlation between PXH and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXH vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXH
SPMO

Financial Services

26.1%
6.0%

Technology

24.3%
53.7%

Basic Materials

10.9%
1.9%

Energy

10.8%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
1.2%

Communication Services

6.2%
7.4%

Industrials

4.6%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.2%

Utilities

2.2%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.1%

Healthcare

0.9%
6.9%

Financial Services

PXH
26.1%
SPMO
6.0%

Technology

PXH
24.3%
SPMO
53.7%

Basic Materials

PXH
10.9%
SPMO
1.9%

Energy

PXH
10.8%
SPMO
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PXH
9.7%
SPMO
1.2%

Communication Services

PXH
6.2%
SPMO
7.4%

Industrials

PXH
4.6%
SPMO
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

PXH
2.9%
SPMO
4.2%

Utilities

PXH
2.2%
SPMO
2.7%

Real Estate

PXH
1.5%
SPMO
1.1%

Healthcare

PXH
0.9%
SPMO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXH vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PXH vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXHSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

1.89

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

6.81

+2.27

PXH vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXH vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXHSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-30.95%

-32.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-15.64%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-20.13%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-22.74%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.42%

-30.95%

-9.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-10.09%

+8.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-4.62%

-12.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

4.33%

-1.05%

Volatility

PXH vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is 4.46%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that PXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXHSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

10.26%

-5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

21.52%

-8.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.44%

23.86%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

20.61%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

20.94%

-1.08%

PXH vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXH vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than SPMO's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
4.20%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.72%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXH and SPMO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to PXH (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 19.70% vs 9.29% for PXH. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 19.70% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 0.72% for SPMO.

PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.13% for SPMO.

PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXH and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer