PXH vs. SLV
PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXH returned 10.91%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for SLV. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
PXH vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 10.91%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
PXH
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
SLV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -22.76%
- YTD
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 85.39%
- 3Y*
- 41.27%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
PXH vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 12.73% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.86% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXH and SLV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007 | 0.32 |
The correlation between PXH and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PXH vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXH
SLV
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
PXH
SLV
-
Technology
PXH
SLV
-
Energy
PXH
SLV
-
Basic Materials
PXH
SLV
Consumer Cyclical
PXH
SLV
-
Communication Services
PXH
SLV
-
Industrials
PXH
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
PXH
SLV
-
Utilities
PXH
SLV
-
Real Estate
PXH
SLV
-
Healthcare
PXH
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXH vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
PXH
SLV
PXH vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.89 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 4.10 | +6.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXH vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -76.28% | +12.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -45.40% | +35.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | -45.40% | +27.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -45.40% | +15.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.42% | -45.40% | +4.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -41.96% | +38.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -44.66% | +27.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 20.88% | -18.03% |
Volatility
PXH vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is 6.41%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that PXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 16.34% | -9.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 59.10% | -46.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 59.82% | -43.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 36.46% | -18.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 32.00% | -11.94% |
PXH vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PXH and SLV have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
PXH vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.49% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXH and SLV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to PXH (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 13.99% vs 10.91% for PXH. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXH and SLV have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SLV is Silver. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.
PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXH and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer