PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXH vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXH vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 10.44%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.20% annualized return.


PXH

1D
0.21%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
10.39%
6M
11.51%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
10.44%

SCHX

1D
0.28%
1M
0.45%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.52%
1Y
24.19%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
15.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXH vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
10.39%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
8.56%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PXH and SCHX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.68

The correlation between PXH and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXH vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXH
SCHX

Financial Services

25.8%
9.9%

Technology

19.9%
38.3%

Energy

13.0%
3.2%

Basic Materials

12.1%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
9.7%

Communication Services

6.2%
10.1%

Industrials

4.6%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
4.4%

Utilities

2.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.0%

Healthcare

0.9%
8.4%

Financial Services

PXH
25.8%
SCHX
9.9%

Technology

PXH
19.9%
SCHX
38.3%

Energy

PXH
13.0%
SCHX
3.2%

Basic Materials

PXH
12.1%
SCHX
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PXH
10.7%
SCHX
9.7%

Communication Services

PXH
6.2%
SCHX
10.1%

Industrials

PXH
4.6%
SCHX
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

PXH
2.8%
SCHX
4.4%

Utilities

PXH
2.4%
SCHX
2.5%

Real Estate

PXH
1.7%
SCHX
2.0%

Healthcare

PXH
0.9%
SCHX
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXH vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXH vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXHSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

2.69

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.56

12.15

-1.59

PXH vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXHSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.98

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.75

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.84

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.84

-0.71

Drawdowns

PXH vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXHSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-34.33%

-29.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-9.02%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-19.04%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-25.41%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.42%

-34.33%

-6.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-2.64%

-2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.86%

-3.97%

-12.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.00%

+0.79%

Volatility

PXH vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 3.84%. This indicates that PXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXHSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

3.84%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

9.44%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

12.27%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

17.16%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

18.17%

+1.91%

PXH vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXH vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than SCHX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
3.57%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.03%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXH and SCHX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXH has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to SCHX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.20% vs 10.44% for PXH. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.20% return vs 10.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 1.03% for SCHX.

PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.03% for SCHX.

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXH and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer