PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXH vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXH vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 10.44%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


PXH

1D
0.21%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
10.39%
6M
11.51%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
10.44%

SCHP

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXH vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
10.39%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
0.96%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PXH and SCHP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010

-0.02

The correlation between PXH and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXH vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXH
SCHP

Financial Services

25.8%
0.0%

Technology

19.9%

-

Energy

13.0%

-

Basic Materials

12.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
100.0%

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Industrials

4.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.8%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Healthcare

0.9%

-

Financial Services

PXH
25.8%
SCHP
0.0%

Technology

PXH
19.9%
SCHP

-

Energy

PXH
13.0%
SCHP

-

Basic Materials

PXH
12.1%
SCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXH
10.7%
SCHP
100.0%

Communication Services

PXH
6.2%
SCHP

-

Industrials

PXH
4.6%
SCHP

-

Consumer Defensive

PXH
2.8%
SCHP

-

Utilities

PXH
2.4%
SCHP

-

Real Estate

PXH
1.7%
SCHP

-

Healthcare

PXH
0.9%
SCHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXH vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXH vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXHSCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

2.50

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.56

7.59

+2.97

PXH vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXHSCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.47

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.17

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.45

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.50

-0.36

Drawdowns

PXH vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXHSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-14.26%

-49.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-1.93%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-4.48%

-13.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-14.26%

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.42%

-14.26%

-26.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-0.89%

-4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.86%

-3.93%

-12.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

0.63%

+2.16%

Volatility

PXH vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that PXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXHSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

1.00%

+5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

2.24%

+10.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

3.29%

+12.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

6.12%

+11.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

5.59%

+14.49%

PXH vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXH vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
3.57%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
4.01%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXH and SCHP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXH has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

On 10-year performance, PXH leads with 10.44% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXH has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 3.57% for PXH.

PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.03% for SCHP.

PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXH and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer