PXH vs. SCHP
PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXH returned 10.44%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for SCHP. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. PXH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
PXH vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 10.44%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.
PXH
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
PXH vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 10.39% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.96% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXH and SCHP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010 | -0.02 |
The correlation between PXH and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PXH vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXH
SCHP
Financial Services
Technology
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
PXH
SCHP
Technology
PXH
SCHP
-
Energy
PXH
SCHP
-
Basic Materials
PXH
SCHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
PXH
SCHP
Communication Services
PXH
SCHP
-
Industrials
PXH
SCHP
-
Consumer Defensive
PXH
SCHP
-
Utilities
PXH
SCHP
-
Real Estate
PXH
SCHP
-
Healthcare
PXH
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXH vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
PXH
SCHP
PXH vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXH | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.50 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.56 | 7.59 | +2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXH | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.47 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.17 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.45 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.50 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
PXH vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXH | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -14.26% | -49.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -1.93% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | -4.48% | -13.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -14.26% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.42% | -14.26% | -26.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -0.89% | -4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -3.93% | -12.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 0.63% | +2.16% |
Volatility
PXH vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that PXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXH | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 1.00% | +5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 2.24% | +10.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 3.29% | +12.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 6.12% | +11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 5.59% | +14.49% |
PXH vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXH vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.57% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.01% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXH and SCHP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXH has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, PXH leads with 10.44% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXH has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 3.57% for PXH.
PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.03% for SCHP.
PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXH and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer