PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXH vs. PPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXH vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than PPA's 10.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 10.99%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.58% annualized return.


PXH

1D
1.80%
1M
4.79%
YTD
16.54%
6M
17.48%
1Y
39.55%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
10.99%

PPA

1D
-0.36%
1M
4.46%
YTD
10.46%
6M
16.02%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
29.68%
5Y*
18.46%
10Y*
17.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXH vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
16.54%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
10.46%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PXH and PPA is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between PXH and PPA has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PXH vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXH
PPA

Financial Services

25.8%

-

Technology

19.9%
9.8%

Energy

13.0%

-

Basic Materials

12.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Communication Services

6.2%
0.1%

Industrials

4.6%
90.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Healthcare

0.9%

-

Financial Services

PXH
25.8%
PPA

-

Technology

PXH
19.9%
PPA
9.8%

Energy

PXH
13.0%
PPA

-

Basic Materials

PXH
12.1%
PPA

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXH
10.7%
PPA

-

Communication Services

PXH
6.2%
PPA
0.1%

Industrials

PXH
4.6%
PPA
90.1%

Consumer Defensive

PXH
2.8%
PPA

-

Utilities

PXH
2.4%
PPA

-

Real Estate

PXH
1.7%
PPA

-

Healthcare

PXH
0.9%
PPA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXH vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXH vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXHPPADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.61

1.59

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

2.29

+1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.27

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

2.20

+1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.79

6.49

+8.30

PXH vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXHPPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.59

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.00

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.86

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.66

-0.52

Drawdowns

PXH vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than PPA's maximum drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and PPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXHPPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-57.37%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-13.71%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-15.24%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-18.37%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.42%

-43.92%

+3.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.77%

+6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-9.18%

-7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

4.66%

-1.91%

Volatility

PXH vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is 5.12%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that PXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXHPPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

6.47%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

16.06%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

18.94%

-3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.77%

18.48%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.07%

20.63%

-0.56%

PXH vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXH vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than PPA's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.38%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
3.38%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXH and PPA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPA has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to PXH (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs PPA's -57.37%.

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.58% vs 10.99% for PXH. On fees, PXH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.58% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PPA.

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.38% for PPA.

PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PPA is Industrials Equities. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.61% for PPA.

PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXH and PPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer