PXH vs. GEME
PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and GEME (Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. PXH is passively managed, while GEME is actively managed. Over the past year, PXH returned 39.55% vs 84.77% for GEME. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GEME.
Performance
PXH vs. GEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly lower than GEME's 40.25% return.
PXH
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
GEME
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 13.51%
- YTD
- 40.25%
- 6M
- 45.99%
- 1Y
- 84.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXH vs. GEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 16.54% | 30.05% |
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 40.25% | 37.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXH and GEME is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PXH and GEME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXH vs. GEME — Risk / Return Rank
PXH
GEME
PXH vs. GEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXH | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.61 | 4.02 | -1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 4.79 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.70 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 6.36 | -2.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.79 | 24.95 | -10.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXH | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 4.02 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 2.73 | -2.58 |
Drawdowns
PXH vs. GEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than GEME's maximum drawdown of -16.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and GEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXH | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -16.86% | -46.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -13.46% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.87% | -2.30% | -14.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.43% | -0.68% |
Volatility
PXH vs. GEME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is 5.12%, while Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that PXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXH | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 8.38% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 17.84% | -5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 21.18% | -5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 22.95% | -5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 22.95% | -2.88% |
PXH vs. GEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GEME's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXH vs. GEME - Dividend Comparison
PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than GEME's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 5.00% | 7.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.38% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXH and GEME have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEME has higher volatility (8.38%) compared to PXH (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs GEME's -16.86%.
On 1-year performance, GEME leads with 84.77% vs 39.55% for PXH. On fees, PXH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GEME has performed better with a 84.77% return vs 39.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GEME.
GEME has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 3.38% for PXH.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacific AM. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.75% for GEME.
GEME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXH and GEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer