PXH vs. EMOP
PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. PXH is passively managed, while EMOP is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for EMOP.
Performance
PXH vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 33.52% return.
PXH
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
EMOP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 9.79%
- YTD
- 33.52%
- 6M
- 35.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXH vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 16.54% | 16.26% |
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 33.52% | 16.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXH and EMOP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.86 |
PXH vs. EMOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXH
EMOP
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
PXH
EMOP
Technology
PXH
EMOP
Energy
PXH
EMOP
Basic Materials
PXH
EMOP
Consumer Cyclical
PXH
EMOP
Communication Services
PXH
EMOP
Industrials
PXH
EMOP
Consumer Defensive
PXH
EMOP
Utilities
PXH
EMOP
Real Estate
PXH
EMOP
Healthcare
PXH
EMOP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXH vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank
PXH
EMOP
PXH vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXH | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.61 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.79 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXH | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 3.01 | -2.86 |
Drawdowns
PXH vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and EMOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXH | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -12.88% | -50.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.87% | -1.91% | -14.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | — | — |
Volatility
PXH vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXH | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 19.87% | -4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 19.87% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 19.87% | +0.20% |
PXH vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXH vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison
PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than EMOP's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.81% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.38% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXH and EMOP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PXH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PXH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.
PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.81% for EMOP.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.70% for EMOP.
Find the right allocation for PXH and EMOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer