PXF vs. GMOI
PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) and GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - PXF tracks the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index while GMOI tracks the MSCI World ex USA Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PXF returned 44.09% vs 36.58% for GMOI. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GMOI.
Performance
PXF vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 21.27% return, which is significantly higher than GMOI's 13.88% return.
PXF
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 21.27%
- 6M
- 25.96%
- 1Y
- 44.09%
- 3Y*
- 25.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
GMOI
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 36.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXF vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 21.27% | 42.51% | -3.54% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 13.88% | 45.64% | -4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXF and GMOI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PXF and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXF vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank
PXF
GMOI
PXF vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXF | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.91 | 2.80 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | 3.84 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.49 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 4.50 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | 17.86 | -1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXF | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | 2.80 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 2.17 | -1.93 |
Drawdowns
PXF vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than GMOI's maximum drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and GMOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXF | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -14.67% | -50.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -8.36% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.26% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -1.71% | -13.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.11% | +0.73% |
Volatility
PXF vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) at 4.20%. This indicates that PXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXF | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 4.20% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 10.25% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 13.15% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 15.59% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 15.59% | +2.45% |
PXF vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXF vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison
PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than GMOI's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 2.40% | 2.74% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.05% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PXF and GMOI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PXF has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to GMOI (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs GMOI's -14.67%.
On 1-year performance, PXF leads with 44.09% vs 36.58% for GMOI. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GMOI has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PXF has performed better with a 44.09% return vs 36.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.
PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 2.40% for GMOI.
PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while GMOI tracks MSCI World ex USA Value. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.60% for GMOI.
PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXF and GMOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer