PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXE vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXE vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXE achieves a 33.64% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PXE has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 8.62%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.


PXE

1D
1.36%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
33.64%
6M
22.49%
1Y
37.56%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
18.55%
10Y*
8.62%

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXE vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXE
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF
33.64%-2.82%-1.86%7.69%58.32%94.04%-36.76%-1.69%-23.35%1.02%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PXE and XMMO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2005

0.55

The correlation between PXE and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXE vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXE
XMMO

Energy

97.4%
7.7%

Basic Materials

2.6%
7.2%

Financial Services

0.3%
2.4%

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

6.3%

Industrials

-

41.1%

Real Estate

-

6.1%

Technology

-

16.7%

Utilities

-

5.8%

Energy

PXE
97.4%
XMMO
7.7%

Basic Materials

PXE
2.6%
XMMO
7.2%

Financial Services

PXE
0.3%
XMMO
2.4%

Communication Services

PXE

-

XMMO
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PXE

-

XMMO
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

PXE

-

XMMO
0.5%

Healthcare

PXE

-

XMMO
6.3%

Industrials

PXE

-

XMMO
41.1%

Real Estate

PXE

-

XMMO
6.1%

Technology

PXE

-

XMMO
16.7%

Utilities

PXE

-

XMMO
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXE vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXE
PXE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXE vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXEXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

4.45

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

18.21

-11.63

PXE vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXE Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXE and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXEXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.99

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.78

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.89

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.58

-0.40

Drawdowns

PXE vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXE drawdown since its inception was -83.99%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXE and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXEXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.99%

-55.37%

-28.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-8.34%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.65%

-24.93%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.65%

-27.91%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.17%

-36.74%

-43.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.57%

0.00%

-7.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.99%

-9.45%

-18.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

2.04%

+3.69%

Volatility

PXE vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 7.82%. This indicates that PXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXEXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.57%

7.82%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.76%

15.54%

+5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.48%

18.71%

+8.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.66%

21.45%

+12.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.99%

22.27%

+14.72%

PXE vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXE has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXE vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

PXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXE
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF
1.99%2.98%2.54%2.78%3.03%1.86%4.10%1.70%1.29%1.54%6.62%2.58%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXE and XMMO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXE has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXE dropped -83.99% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 8.62% for PXE. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXE.

PXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

PXE is categorized as Energy Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. PXE tracks Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Intellidex Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXE and 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXE and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer