PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXE vs. HAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXE vs. HAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXE achieves a 33.64% return, which is significantly higher than HAP's 21.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PXE has underperformed HAP with an annualized return of 8.62%, while HAP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.99% annualized return.


PXE

1D
1.36%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
33.64%
6M
22.49%
1Y
37.56%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
18.55%
10Y*
8.62%

HAP

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.64%
YTD
21.49%
6M
23.70%
1Y
46.66%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXE vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXE
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF
33.64%-2.82%-1.86%7.69%58.32%94.04%-36.76%-1.69%-23.35%1.02%
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
21.49%34.91%-4.08%2.46%7.84%25.04%6.30%18.60%-10.68%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PXE and HAP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2008

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between PXE and HAP has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PXE vs. HAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXE
HAP

Energy

97.4%
32.3%

Basic Materials

2.6%
36.7%

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.5%

Healthcare

-

2.8%

Industrials

-

10.2%

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Technology

-

0.9%

Utilities

-

9.8%

Energy

PXE
97.4%
HAP
32.3%

Basic Materials

PXE
2.6%
HAP
36.7%

Financial Services

PXE
0.3%
HAP

-

Communication Services

PXE

-

HAP

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXE

-

HAP
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

PXE

-

HAP
6.5%

Healthcare

PXE

-

HAP
2.8%

Industrials

PXE

-

HAP
10.2%

Real Estate

PXE

-

HAP
0.4%

Technology

PXE

-

HAP
0.9%

Utilities

PXE

-

HAP
9.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXE vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXE
PXE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HAP
HAP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXE vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXEHAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.56

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

5.65

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

23.05

-16.47

PXE vs. HAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXE Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the HAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXE and HAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXEHAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

3.14

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.63

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.61

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.26

-0.08

Drawdowns

PXE vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXE drawdown since its inception was -83.99%, which is greater than HAP's maximum drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXE and HAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXEHAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.99%

-50.73%

-33.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-8.31%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.65%

-16.92%

-20.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.65%

-25.66%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.17%

-44.07%

-36.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.57%

-1.95%

-5.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.99%

-12.03%

-15.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

2.03%

+3.70%

Volatility

PXE vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) at 4.37%. This indicates that PXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXEHAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.57%

4.37%

+5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.76%

12.24%

+8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.48%

14.91%

+12.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.66%

18.24%

+15.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.99%

19.74%

+17.25%

PXE vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXE has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXE vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison

PXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than HAP's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
1.87%2.27%2.65%3.27%3.28%2.16%2.45%2.80%2.85%2.02%1.99%3.00%
PXE
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF
1.99%2.98%2.54%2.78%3.03%1.86%4.10%1.70%1.29%1.54%6.62%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXE and HAP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXE has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to HAP (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXE dropped -83.99% vs HAP's -50.73%.

On 10-year performance, HAP leads with 11.99% vs 8.62% for PXE. On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HAP has performed better with a 11.99% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXE.

PXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.87% for HAP.

PXE tracks Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Intellidex Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXE and 0.42% for HAP.

HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXE and HAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer