PWZ vs. MMMA
PWZ (Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) and MMMA (NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. PWZ is passively managed, while MMMA is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWZ charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MMMA.
Performance
PWZ vs. MMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWZ achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than MMMA's 3.45% return.
PWZ
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- 8.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
MMMA
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWZ vs. MMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PWZ Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 2.63% | 0.35% |
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 3.45% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWZ and MMMA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWZ vs. MMMA — Risk / Return Rank
PWZ
MMMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PWZ vs. MMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWZ | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWZ vs. MMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWZ drawdown since its inception was -21.49%, which is greater than MMMA's maximum drawdown of -2.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWZ and MMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWZ | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.49% | -2.79% | -18.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.09% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -0.55% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | — | — |
Volatility
PWZ vs. MMMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWZ | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28% | 4.04% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.25% | 4.04% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.89% | 4.04% | +1.85% |
PWZ vs. MMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWZ has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than MMMA's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWZ vs. MMMA - Dividend Comparison
PWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than MMMA's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 1.95% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWZ Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.61% | 3.41% | 3.28% | 2.84% | 2.49% | 2.28% | 2.34% | 2.51% | 2.53% | 2.48% | 2.86% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWZ and MMMA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PWZ is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PWZ is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MMMA.
PWZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.95% for MMMA.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and NYLI. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PWZ and 0.35% for MMMA.
Find the right allocation for PWZ and MMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer